Quote Wires71="Wires71"I'm just basing it on the 22 years of track record. The final always contains one of them, the final has been won by one of them in 19/22 times (86% due to 3 Bradford wins). Why would that change in 2020?
Hull have signed well but I think they need a top quality coach to be challenging.'"
Interesting point about quality of coaching. Usually you can look at the table and expect to see the top clubs being the ones with the best coaches. But currently in SL there seems to be little correlation between the perceived quality of the coach and where teams are expected to finish.
Eg here's a rough categorisation:
Coaches with a proven track record of doing a good job in SL:
Toronto (McDermott)
Hull KR (Smith)
Castleford (Powell)
Coaches who have won stuff but the jury is still out:
Hull (Radford)
Catalans (McNamara)
Warrington (Price)
Coaches who have achieved more than expected with limited resources:
Salford (Watson)
Wakefield Trinity (Chester)
Coaches who are unproven/unknown:
St Helens (Woolf)
Wigan (Lam)
Coaches who haven't done particularly well in SL:
Leeds (Agar)
Huddersfield (Woolford)
Doesn't really map over to expectations about where the teams will finish? Is quality of coaching really a decisive factor in the current SL?