I didn't see it & it wasn't on SL show but you would think it would be a feature on the SL show just so fans know why there players are being carded .

i thought it was pretty bad at the time, plus we were getting walked down field so it came in an obvious period of frustration

Get shut please. Simply not good enough.

I do like what he is capable of but he doesn't play enough games after injuries and suspensions, plus when he does play he doesn't spend enough time on the pitch. We need 2 more quality props so I'd rather have cap space than tasi or sita.

Let's be honest. Sits and BBM could be partners in crime. They can be briefly awesome and a mostly garbage.

He's an exciting player to watch at times which can cloud judgments (it has mine) but in reality there is very little overall production.

He’s even admitted himself on Twittter it was a bad tackle so wtf did you do it then knowing you could and now are going to miss the semi?Brain fart only explanation.

I found myself wondering why we seem to have a player banned for like every other game. What has changed? I get annoyed when it could be avoided and putting the players that don't, under more pressure. We don't need to rotate the players the judiciary does it for us.

Watching State of Origin this year each game had about 20 tackles that would have seen players in SL walking off the pitch and hit with bans.

Sita's tackle was a bad one yes but in the overall scope of SL the disciplinary panel are completely over the top. It's a rough, tough game. Played by big lads who are filled to the brim with testosterone and are expected to go and run through brick walls and stay calm and focused at the same time.

The disciplinary reviews don't match up with the live spectacle the game wants to show. At the minute they want two completely different things and that's why the game has become stagnant, predictable and at times, boring.

This isn't a knee-jerk reaction either, I think it's been this way for a few years now and annoys me when I see players from any team banned over stupid stuff.

If we're honest ONE of the main reasons we all got hooked on RL (those of a certain age) was due to the biff/violence. The origin game three was quality last week but it still missed the biff and the game is worse for it. They still embrace it in Ice Hockey (which is a pretty dull sport apart from the odd outbreak of a scrap) so we should go back to, if not endorsing it, letting it be.

Not even taking into account the increased quality, the NRL is just a much better watch. Officiated, broadcasted and ruled a lot better.

I hate the disciplinary process in SL. It's stupid how a player can get sin-binned (or give away a penalty) and then banned. A ban should only follow a sending off or a bad ref error.

The games gone daft run by Imbecile's sita as put 2 players on there behind (yes I know one to hospital) due to poor tackling techniques and yet there were calls from the minority for sita to change the way he runs..then golden boy gets 10 mins in sin bin for a crusher tackle at an field..hill does similar and gets 2 matches....I won't mention the officiating at last years gf with the weasel at full back...to me its not a level playing field