Really? Which one would you have given the other way? They were all very blatant and obvious decisions I thought. I didn't see any the video ref got wrong. At least half of them should never have gone upstairs in the first place, he was going up just in case, rather than because he was genuinely unsure.

golden boys try at our place was no different to clarks...nowt wrong with 2 of pennys trys and the other was debatable..whilst we are on about dodgy decisions re-wind to some of yours this season widnes in cup knock on try given hudds at home another knock on try given....try at cas given despite player being off side from a kick..all on tv viewed by vid ref....if only we had them decisions tonight we`d have put 60 on you shower

out of interest, which tries penny had disallowed were "nowt wrong with em" and which was debatable?
although 1 or 2 could be seen as harsh i thought they were all right decisions

Lol. Clark clearly knocked on. Amor tackled the arms which forced the ball out. The Roby one at the HJ was because the Wire defender used his knee deliberately to attack the ball. That time the video ref spent the time deciding whether it was try, penalty try or 8 point try, they mentioned it on Sky at the time. Both of Penny's were very clear, first he completely lost onto the knee of the Saints defender and the second was a clear push in the back to move the Saints defender out of the way.

No complaints on you calling us a shower. We're very poor. Sad indictment on your season however when you're so far behind such a poor side. If you hadn't lost 3 to us, you might have had a chance of the top 4.

I know they can't go to the video ref for it but the pass from Walsh just before the first Saints try looked pretty obviously forward to me - and my 11 year old son as we both called "forward" at exactly the same time

It probably was. Ratchford's to Johnson looked equally suspicious live, but okay on the replay.

Wire have had their fair share of dubious ones go for them this season. 2 against the rhinos at home could have gone the other way.

The game is fudged with the standard of officiating.

There is no scope for physical interaction in this game.

The second Atkins on Makinson interference wasn't correct. Makinson was never getting that ball in a million years and Atkins slightly touched his arm, literally the slightest of touches.

Plus Amor punched the ball out...play on...then Clark grounded it...TRY! There was no knock-on by Clark anywhere in that move.

Bit of a random one, but I've often thought why don't they give the tennis method a go...

Each team has say 3 VR calls per half, if the defending team feels there is a need for VR the on field captain requests it to go upstairs. The 3 calls don't carry over if you don't use in first half. The on field ref then has to make the call more often than not

The thing with video refs this year more than ever is the system they use now. I've got a try just check etc etc, if he's got a try then he thinks they have scored that should be it end of,wether he is right or wrong that should be it. Someone as already said they are only human so will make mistakes. For me Id rather they got shut of them it's slowing the game down to much.