Can't see a problem with this, as the lad has played at full back representative level & is his natural/prefered. Also, as has been discussed on here a lot, full back is a specialist position & not one that you can just "drop into". Dont get me wrong, I think Hicks did a decent job covering, but he's a much more effective weapon in his natural/prefered wing position.
It's also nice to see a coach playing players in their correct positions - whether this is successful remains to be seen.

i reckon he'll go alright, if lowes puts him there he obviously has confidence in him dealing with kicks which he will have seen in the off season and should be able to handle defence from fullback against breaks from all but the biggest thinking back to the job he did on tadulala last year (apart from the one cross field bomb which he got steamrollered on)

You wouldn't believe me if I told you. Was told they were looking to spell Benny at 9

Couldn't tell if it was tongue in cheek and I heard Blythe was starting, which again seemed strange.
Probably codswollop but he was right about Riley and Gleeson.

Maybe he meant that Benny would be subsituted at exactly 9pm?

If Louis isn't fit then I can see Blythe starting, he looked quality last year.

[urlhttp://www.warringtonguardian.co.uk/wolves/4122444.Riley_wants_to_be_number_one/[/url

Good on him. Hopefully he take his opportunity well in a Lee Smith @ the Grand Final kinda way!

Lets hope he doesn't make an error early on then tonight.

This could be Jimmy's making.

To beat Saints you have to kick high to the outside backs & to target the side where Armstrong is (or who ever is replacing Meli).

Leaving Hicks & King in the backs is the better option, especially as our main strike centre is out.