Yeah rotating, they have complemented each other very well so far this season.

Mathers as the last line of defence is superb. The amount of times he gets under the body of a player over the try line to hold them up is as good as anybody in the league.

If a fullback is faced with a player one on one in mid-field it means somebody else has failed in defence not the fullback.

Im more than happy with where the two ended up

I would say that King, Atkins and Bridge are and have played better than at centre than Gleeson has over a similar period since he left us.

Which of the three do you reckon Gleeson has played better than over that period?


Plus we got £100k and released getting on for another £100k of our salary cap

edited by PY = I'd forgotten what to do.

Hey double post - making up for lost time PY?

Remember that Gleeson said he wanted a move. I wouldn't want any player wearing a wire shirt who didn't want to play for us.

Martin Gleeson's tragic he wears a tragic hat. That songs awesome.

Chris Riley's try scoring rate is exactly 1 in 2. Don't know how it compares to other wingers in the league but to dismiss him as average, as some might, seems harsh. If we'd picked him up from South Sydney's stiffs for a pittance we'd all be having wet dreams about what a great pick up that was and how great our scouts were. Our pants should even more moist when you consider he's a Warrington born academy/squadbuilder product.

I wouldn't go THAT far but I'd certainly take Bridge as a direct replacement and £100,000. Bridge has that same class about him, better player? probably imho
King's played well but Atkins isn't in the same class as Bridge/Gleeson as a centre

Going off what, 7 games?

Some truth in that pal. King was not great in his first season and a half never mind 7 games. Give the lad time, he has all the attributes and I trust Smith's judgement.

Well said