One person said Sinfield.

Tony Smith more or less stated that his spending was done with regards to bringing new players in during the video. Although he did look a little uneasy with the question.

maybe the spending is done but they just havent announced it - economical with the truth

its like football - when they ask a player has he been contacted by such a club and he says no - technically its true because a club would contact his agent about a move and not the player

are you not signing bryant from celtic crusaders

I think we do need another prop, when Rah departs we will look a little thin in that area.

probably not, we already have Morley, Carvell, Cooper and Wood.

as back up we can always call upon Harrison, Westwood or Louis Anderson.

I can only see another signing if someone unexpected leaves ie, Bridge, Hicks, Clarke etc.

Your right Rah did look like he had put a bit of beef on didn't he.

probably too much, against wakey he was like watching a cruise liner turn around.

It was more than Latchy. I remember somebody making a thread saying Sinfield will definitely be a Wire next year. Might have been panties.

Well it won't be this guy.

rlhttps://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,12196_5543896,00.htmlrl

Morley will be gutted, he owes him a big hit or two after the CC Q,final.

Smith has said there will be no more 'external' signings. And therefore is looking to promote from within, lets hope the likes of Cooper and Neal continue to develop.

Playing devils advocate, maybe there is a fourth signed and not announced, so technically we wouldn't make any more!