I don't remember seeing that Williams incident. Did anyone else?

There are 5 incidents each using the same description but only George gets a ban????. I have watched the game back and didn't notice anything that warranted a ban by George.

A trip used to be a match ban at one time now apparently £250 fine

Fez I've also just rewatched the game and didn't spot anything untoward as far as Williams was concerned but also think that the non referral for Fitzgibbon was correct.

Williams may have warranted a week's rest perhaps less so with Hayes missing but re refereeing games after the event if that's what they are doing is barking mad

For me, if something wasn't spotted or pulled up during the game, then that's it....but unfortunately that smacks of common sense, and we know that Cullen & his cronies don't do common sense.

Exactly and it's not as if much should get missed on the day with every game televised

Doing us a favour so that Burgess can’t be blamed for dropping him if we lose.*

* Copyright Redveeeee

We both know that George wasn’t going to play anyway. I watched the Catalan game and to be honest I did not see him involved in any incident that warranted a ban.

So hey Paul can you ban George this week, sure Sam il sort that.

By eck I think I have spotted the horrific foul play that got George the ban.....it's at 62 minutes and its horrible......not, the games gone soft. Took three watches to spot it Absolutely ridiculous. As many have said previously that shower of a committee is not fit for purpose and is ....... well I had better shut up for fear of getting myself a ban

Meanwhile, I see that the Pope is facing a 6-8 week ban. It could keep him out until round 21 but should be available for Magic Weekend https://www.rugby-league.com/article/62 ... view-panel