who will you play as prop's if both are banned?

No I'm not, but it was a careless technique that could have caused very serious injury. If I (and the RFL) thought it was deliberate, he'd be looking at a much, much worse punishment.

can i ask who have they played to make them look impressive cos celtic and hull kr wont be near at the end .dont get it at all

this what i have been saying all week. lets wait and see till they play the big boys i.e us on saturday, leeds and saints etc.

No flipping way.
carvell's is a joke and Morleys should get a ban imo, maybe a match, reckless and stupid.

Against Hull KR which is the only game we can really judge them on i`d say they looked solid rather than being spectacular, they didn`t create a great deal with ball in hand, it was the kicks from Sam Tomkins that did the damage. Apart from the Amos Roberts break away try near the end they didn`t really open up Hull KR that often with ball in hand.

It was a bit similar to us really, we didn`t create a lot with ball in hand, it was mainly our kicks that did the damage, we then had the Lee Briers interception and the last try at the end where he wanted to drop a goal but was closed down quickly forcing him to run to his left where he found Richie Myler who took his try brilliantly.

Our pack offers more than theirs does along with our hookers, we just need to get the backs like Atkins and Bridge into play a bit more as we have an in form winger outside of Chris Bridge and Matt King is always a threat with his height and power close to the line.

Agreed.

I'd say we have an in-form centre too Rob, last week Bridge was electric against Quins, and on Sunday again, he was our most dangerous back. He's the most 'dynamic' of our backs by a mile.

Accidental being Carvell looking sideways towards Jackson then raising his elbow, then yes, it was accidental