16 try assists say's different and that's with missing a good chunk of games this year, and if you did watch the T.v games you would of seen that he was one of the stand out performers against both Wigan and Saints

The solution is simple. Scrap the weekly rounds, have a little knock-out competition in September and early October (8 teams drawn from a hat) with a grand finale gala night at the Salford City Stadium and bob's your uncle. This would leave 7 months to prepare the international team.,,,,,,,,,and there's always the Challenge Cup. Sorted.

I feel like last week was all for nothing you lot come out and smashed us all over the show yet go down London with a weak team and get spanked

So the question is what was the point in putting everything into our game if Smith knew there was a shot of losing the week after?

I know some will say just to beat you but i'd sooner be on the losing end coming into the play offs if we meet in the final i think our players will have an extra reason to go all out

That's the point though, you don't debate at all. You just troll and make comments about us signing players over the age of 30. You (and specifically you) bring nothing to this board. I don't know how old you are but you behave like a child on here.

As for last nights debacle, last nights game was about 3 things (in order)

1- Freshness for Wembley
2 - Freshness for play offs
3 - Avoiding loathsome club call

No issue with that in principle but Smith can't be pleased with getting battered that close to Wembley, regardless of the personnel.

I am not a Warrington Supporter, and it is fair to say I have never wanted them to beat my club. Having said that, I have always thought that Warrington want to compete. They didn't even try last night.

I feel so sorry for the fans who spent quite a lot of money to go down to London to watch the fiasco that was on show.
I know that Tony Rea has improved the performance of London, but I don't think that he has improved them that much so that they could trounce Warrington.

Just one request. Can we have the same team when you come to Widnes on the 9th September?

Why we lost (IMO)

1. Players were not committed

2. We can make 3-4 changes to team but not 7;
You lose team cohesion and by definition play people that are out of form (cooper and Bridge) and not match fit ( Solo ).

Does it matter ?

Because of the playoff system and Wembly next week, everyone was steeled for team changes and a possible loss. But to concede 60 points ?

All our teams, whether U15 or 1st team must be fully prepared and committed for every match they play. This was a failure of the coach and the team itself. It was unprofessional and unacceptable for the fans that spent the time and money going to the match.

I was waiting for a big fat Warringtonian to set fire to his shirt a la March 2009 but Solomona didn't have any matches!

Nonsense. The fundamental reason that Wire lost by a big score last night is that London were outstanding - especially in the second half. The Wire team that took the field would have been good enough to beat the pre-Rea London. Last night's London was what some of us were expecting from the start this year, given the calibre of players in the squad. Warrington were not good last night, but credit to London where due.

Another fan who seems to have failed to notice how well London played last night.

See your second paragraph. London last night were outstanding, and played to the standard that could be expected from the quality of players in their squad. Rea has transformed them. I was in London and not happy but give credit to a great Broncos performance.

Because they've laid a marker down should we meet them again this year. Our players looks shocked and intimidated last week and the fact that a weakened Wire got hammered at London won't make a bit of difference should we play Wire in the play offs.

I've said all season I couldn't give a monkeys if we finish 1st or 4th because you get the same benefits pretty much and come those play off matches your league position won't matter.

The scars of previous matches might though.

Received wisdom is that the best way not to get injured is to go in hard but I've never been totally convinced by this. It must have been in the minds of the players out there who hope to get chosen for next week that the worst thing that could happen is that they put themselves out due to damage done against London. You are not likely to get hurt in a tackle that you don't make or by not charging headlong into their biggest forwards.

Combining that with players who are out of position or don't play together too often and I suppose it's not the best recipe for success.

I hope there won't be a confidence issue as a result but there shouldn't be. I still think we're favourites for the final but it could be close and I look forward to a good game. I hope LRB is fit and plays against us.

As I have previously stated, Saints and Wigan were purely a case of getting second secured. Putting a marker down didn't really register until it was put to me yesterday. The intimidation slant was compounded further by Wane's preceding comments.

All that said, we did get mullered by London, so all that effort was in vain as we now can't win the LLS. Bearing in mind we have no control of Wigan's destiny.

PS

I think your thoughts may be a little too lateral for king warrior.

Don't take saddend! on mate, he's pulling your chain....