I suppose Fitzgibbon would be fine ... if we really have to. Lending out players is a risky business & we have cut it too fine.

It’s no wonder Vaughan is clocking great stats and meters every time he plays.
Because he’s only ever available for teams that rollover.
Has he even played against Saints or Wigan yet?
He gets himself banned for soft grub stuff.
If he wants to be a bit grubby, then at least hit and soften someone up like Westwood.

It’s no wonder Vaughan is clocking great stats and meters every time he plays.
Because he’s only ever available for teams that rollover.
Has he even played against Saints or Wigan yet?
He gets himself banned for soft grub stuff.
If he wants to be a bit grubby, then at least hit and soften someone up like Westwood.

Really living up to your name with this one aren't you?

Leeds are missing Sangare, Smith (big loss that) and Bentley (I believe).

Someone call the police RD is being held hostage and this is his”safe” message.

There's a shock Wigan player leads with elbow gets a one match ban Vaughan lifts a player gets 2 thank god he didn't grab his shirt to help him up or he'd miss half the season...the games bent and corrupt and run by total imbeciles

Byrne has been referred to Tribunal though. It's not corrupt, quite a bit of incompetence, but not corrupt.

Course it is Morgan Knowles the other year gets banned for 2 games appeal still 2 games appeal again and gets away with it and plays in a final..Harry smith v cas does the same as Vaughan no match ban so he can play against Penrith it stinks as so does the game...bent and corrupt

I didn't get a good view of Vaughan's tackle, or the replay on the big screen. But am I the only one who doesn't think it was even a penalty? Did he actually lift his legs 'above the horizontal'?

Not a case of piledriving an opponent, but a Penalty for me (unfortunately), whilst I don't think the legs were particularly high "above the horizontal" it was more the way he landed that was concern and Vaughan by his reaction instantly knew it.

landed on his head and neck, he gave the referee a decision to make. it was daft.

but so was all of that opening stint by vaughan, worst 14 minutes he's had in just over a year.

Totally disagree re “bent” comment. I see this on other forums (especially you know where) and find it ridiculous. The only issue that totally baffled me was Harry Smith not being banned.
Vaughan was always going to get banned, no surprise at all.

We should definitely be appealing it to get it reduced - 2 games is very harsh when Smith got none. If we can't get that reduced then we really need to change our representatives.