No.

Too injury prone

I have mixed views on Johnson, he's a good player to have in your team because of his versatility, although he hasn't got the speed for Wing he is a solid 2nd row or centre.
I'm sure he will do a good job on Sunday instead of Westwood but he does visit the the treatment room far to often, if he can put in some solid performances and stay injury free from now until the end of the year i would give him a years contract but if another team was to make a bid it would be worth some serious thought.

I've said before I would rather us keep Vanderson or Johnson, instead of them both. On current form, I would keep Vanderson...but I do like PJ's attitude.

No.

I think its all been said. A quality player but injuries have taken there toll and he is probably past his best.

I really like Johnson, but you're right.
Sad it may be but life moves on. (A few years ago was as good as Gilmore is now).

Yes.





























But only to be awkward............

If he would accept a low contract I would keep him but really can't see in.

Shame really if he's fit he's good, but watching him play I always get the feeling that another injury is just around the corner.

And for that exact reason an unfortunate No.

Sadly no. He's seems a great guy attitude wise, but now his best days are behind him rather than in front.

Sorry too injury prone and to long in the tooth.

No

I'd have him put the cones out and wearing the headphones.

That game against stains last year somes him up really...puts out some of the best passes ive ever seen for hicks on that centre in man of steel form oonly to break his leg in the 2nd half :/

Can't see him agreeing to that when he's only 30 & probably wants to carry on playing