www.warringtonguardian.co.uk/new ... our_years/

www.warringtonguardian.co.uk/new ... our_years/

4 years is a bit excessive.

carries a max of 10 years but i see where you're coming from

Typical knee jerk reaction from the judiciary.
4 years is excessive, but proberley deserves it for being called Perry.

You should be locked up for four years for that horrific attempt at spelling probably.

I think people would have been complaining had he got away with a slap on the wrist, and he was trying to insight mass violence and robbery, which would have increased our taxes and ruined our town. Four years is a good sentence in my eyes, because he'll end up having it reduced for good behaviour.

Maybe excessive compared to sentences handed out for other crimes but if the tool had managed to organise trouble in the town then people would be crying out for a tougher term.

About time the country got tough, hopefully it will make others think before doing similar.

What about your attempt to spell 'incite'?

LOL.

I wasn't 'trying to defend' it. There isn't anything to defend. It's just a different game, and I think RL would be miles better off if it removed this enormous chip on its shoulder which it has about rugby union, that's all.

I know, I know.

The only way to step out of the shadows is to stop comparing the two, and get on with being the better game.

Exactly.

This....

[

+2

4 Years seems fair to me. It'll certainly make some people think that you can't hide behind a keyboard.

Now let's see if we can toughen up sentences for corrupt Bankers and for MP's who fiddle expenses.....

Well, this is it, isn't it? It would be nice to see every MP who fiddled their books be made to serve without the capacity to claim expenses.

Though I think incarcerating morons like this for four years is the wrong tactic. Being inside will likely just make him think he's even more of a badman - massive, prolonged, unpleasant community service would be my preferred punishment in cases like this.