news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 124595.stm I agree and I know its been talked about before on here and we will be the same old 'its too expensive' but what can/ could be done?

news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 124595.stm I agree and I know its been talked about before on here and we will be the same old 'its too expensive' but what can/ could be done?

either use it in every game or get rid simple really

It all balances out so don't bother expanding it. Waste of money.

Who balances it out? Refs? Are you suggesting refs give decisions to 'balance things out'?

I'd like to see the way it is used to changed to a challenge system like in the NFL and tennis.

Ref makes his call as he sees it, teams allowed 2 challenges per half, and if inconclusive, then revert to on field call.

Half of the decisions that get sent to the video ref aren't needed, both sets of players reactions tell you know they the outcome before the first replay appears on the big screen - sometimes you get both sides set for a scrum before the video ref has given his decision.

Tend too agree with. With the former that is.

I agree. I thought Andy Wilson's rant about the 'playing by the same rules' argument was spot on. As long as the two teams playing each other have the same conditions then it is fine.

Who is to say that you are advantaged or disadvantaged by having a VR at the game?

That said, the figure of £40k per club per year didn't seem massive, I wonder if that was for the basic version (4 or 5 cameras as tested last year at Hull vs KR)?

www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdRq6Kj_uR8 Reggie sums it up

www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdRq6Kj_uR8 Reggie sums it up

Brilliant

FINGER UP BUM! NICE

wouldn't it be great if we had something similar to soccer AM for rugby fans

on the same lines i think sky should have fans comentating on the game via the red button one from each team! in a room no censorship

hull v hull kr would need a glass partition



as an alternative to eddie and stevo, it would work for me