Club reports that Gellling is available for selection again, although the Police investigation is ongoing.

Guess he will go straight back in for the Hull game.

Not sure about this and how it plays out legally but morally if I was Price (I’m not, as I clearly have a chin) I wouldn’t be considering playing him.

I'm sure that the club will have taken legal advice and, as the statement says, they have conducted their own internal inquiry. The police investigation could roll on for some time. It may or may not result in a prosecution, if it does then a court case will take longer and there is no saying whether it would result in a guilty verdict or an aquittal.

If the player hasn't been charged with an offence and the club's own investigation hasn't turned up anything else then yes he should be considered for selection.

Honestly seems some common sense is actually happening.

I don't know what he is accused of doing and have not looked to find out because well I don't need to know, but if the club have investigated and are allowing him to come back then it cannot be serious enough to warrant keeping him suspended or sacking him.

If they are now waiting for the Police to conclude there investigation, then there is nothing really I suspect the club can do other than allow him back.

People can think what they want about it, whether it's a good or bad thing but only the club can make the choice as to whether he is allowed to play or not until the Police conclude the investigation at which time he will either be charged or not charged.

Best thing posted on here for years.

As it happens, though I do believe in innocent until proven guilty, I think he should be unavailable for selection until the Police have concluded their investigation. Doesn't sit right with me at all this.

Not sure he should go straight in ahead of Brand

Screw the morals. They’ve never bothered the Pies.
If I’m paying him....I’m playing him.

Brand shouldn't play v Hull regardless - their threequarter line is huge and he would be targetted. If we don't go with Gelling then switch Currie for this one.

How far off are we with Hughes?

I don't think that I've seen anything yet about him training again so my guess, and it is a guess, is that we're looking at the other side of Easter.

Cue the pitch forks and burning torches

Correct decision by the club. I suspect Gelling has changed status from “bail” to “released under investigation. There is no time limit attached to the latter and there are cases where it has been 18 months+. Innocent until proved otherwise by a jury/magistrates, let him play if his head is in the right place (or as right as it has ever been).

Gelling trained with the squad last week.

I don't think it would have been right to leave Gelling in Rugby League limbo for what may be a lengthy legal process. The club has a duty of care to him while he is an employee.

Innocent until proven guilty but I think Warrington were right to suspend him (paid) initially until it knew more information. The club will act accordingly if any alleged crime is proven.

I think the club has dealt with a very tricky situation very well thus far.