Currie was our best. Back row is vulnerable, Holroyd and Russell were ok but feel like they are plugging gaps rather than them being there on purpose. Dufty turned it around towards the end but wasn’t great if we’re honest. Same with Walker, as the game went on he got better. Don’t get the Vaughan and King comments, again. But everyone needs a scapegoat I suppose. A win and a clean bill of health, we’ll take that for round 1

[quote="Wires71":2li5ftgc]So, following your rationale...why sign him? Why play him in the pre-season games and not Ratchford?[/quote:2li5ftgc] I don’t know why you bite, he loves attention it’s that simple.

[quote="rubber duckie":ulqfb8st]His team also finished the season bottom of the league.[/quote:ulqfb8st] Mate this is such a stupid comment it's unreal, i didn't realise London finished bottom because Leyland started every week. Makes you wonder why we play Ratchford, Williams, Ashton, King, Walker, Currie etc because we finished 11th a few years ago, clearly awful players.

[quote="Or thane"]Mate this is such a stupid comment it's unreal/quote] You did see who wrote it?

[quote="Or thane":3iggo12x]Mate this is such a stupid comment it's unreal, i didn't realise London finished bottom because Leyland started every week. Makes you wonder why we play Ratchford, Williams, Ashton, King, Walker, Currie etc because we finished 11th a few years ago, clearly awful players.[/quote:3iggo12x] Incidentally, Salford finished 11th in the season before Ratchford came to us, whereas we had won the LLS. So arguably Ratchford should never have got a game for us.

[quote="rubber duckie":143equo4]they’ll be some eggy faces on here.[/quote:143equo4] shame you wont be able to see them, as you're currently buried under about 10ft of omelette.