FORUMS > Warrington Wolves > This week’s disciplinary |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 32159 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2013 | 11 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
icons1949_files/3947-1360Zapper-msnicons.jpg :icons1949_files/3947-1360Zapper-msnicons.jpg |
|
| Quote: wire2004 "Could I please back up a bit to this post for a second.
Is Taylor-Wray the player who played the wigan league match before the challenge cup final at full back?
If he was. Wasn't he injured quite badly and out for the rest of the year? He tore something if I remember rightly???
If he was the player. (I forgot the guys name who played. So I am hoping it's the same player) he was a really good prospect for the future and was touted to be the next full back after dufty.
I really liked him and his attitude he had for a debut and I would like to see him get some game time and learn off dufty more in the 1st team.
If he isn't the same player. Does that noy mean we have 2 potential full backs in the academy who are going to be pushing for seniority for the future full back. Which is only good for the club.'"
Yes, he did play at fullback for Wire versus Wigan, prior to the Challenge Cup Final.
He hasn`t suffered a season long injury and hence he is available to play now as required...... potentially in the London league game next week.
I agree he is a great prospect.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1033 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
17895_1586272293.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_17895.jpg |
|
| Quote: The Reaper "He should probably learn that he needs to get lower. He was far too high for shoulder contact and if he doesn’t learn then he’s going to have this happen time and time again. The rules aren’t going to change, or if they do then it’s only going to get more harsh'"
Wow! Rules are rules and it's the players that need to learn? Well, that's quite the change of tune from when Makinson got banned, and you said: "I genuinely can't stand the MRP. Don't know what they do, or what they bring to the game. Handing out retroactive bans for everything has always been stupid as love and that's not even talking about the inconsistency and incompetence they exhibit in doing that stupid job. We need a new system asap."
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2757 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
18243.jpg Ettinghausen's gone ice skatin':18243.jpg |
|
| Also telling Vaughan to get lower when Makinson jumped in the air AGAIN!!
I’m still baffled as to why Bell never received a lengthy ban for his assault on Ratchford. That was no accident.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 11871 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: ratticusfinch "Also telling Vaughan to get lower when Makinson jumped in the air AGAIN!!
I’m still baffled as to why Bell never received a lengthy ban for his assault on Ratchford. That was no accident.'"
And Makinson jumps in the air yet gets a 1 game reduction so he can play his last home game for the club. In that case you can’t have told Vaughan he should have jumped up. Yeh totally ridiculous statement by me but given some of the bans or none bans out the whole process is ridiculous.
For what it’s worth I personally thought the Makinson ban was harsh at the time but for me his was worse than what Vaughan got the same ban for but gets a reduction and Vaughan does not, I’d like to know how that is.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 398 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2014 | 10 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
72483_1397997052.jpg [b:90hulqic][color=#BF0040:90hulqic]The only reason they look up to you is because they chose to kneel.[/color:90hulqic][/b:90hulqic]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_72483.jpg |
|
| Quote: The Speculator "Wow! Rules are rules and it's the players that need to learn? Well, that's quite the change of tune from when Makinson got banned, and you said
Yes, and nothing I said here contradicts that at all lmao. I was responding to a post that said "what is it that Vaughan is supposed to learn?". The lesson he needs to learn is obvious as his technique was all wrong for today's rules. It has nothing to do with my opinion on the MRP. You won't find me saying that he should be banned for 3 games or that I agree with that, because it's ridiculous. As have all the recent bans been for similar tackles. That doesn't change the fact that it's going to keep happening unless the players learn the lessons though, as Morgan Knowles and indeed Tommy Makinson keep finding out...
FWIW I dont have a problem with the rules themselves. I 100% understand the need to try and minimise head collisions and protect players and the game itself. I think the red card for the tackle was completely fair, even if I think we are seeing far, far too many red and yellow cards in general. My problem is with the MRP and retroactively giving out ridiculous suspensions as I don't think there is any evidence whatsoever that this is effective for achieving their goal and all its doing is harming the game and ing off the fanbase, leaving swaths of players on the sidelines every week. A red card, and an auto 1 game ban due to getting a red card should be the punishment imo. And similar to football, you can hand out an auto triggered 1 game ban after you've accumulated 3-5 yellows or something like that. You can scrap the MRP or leave them to deal with stuff the ref actually puts on report and nothing else
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 398 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2014 | 10 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
72483_1397997052.jpg [b:90hulqic][color=#BF0040:90hulqic]The only reason they look up to you is because they chose to kneel.[/color:90hulqic][/b:90hulqic]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_72483.jpg |
|
| Quote: ratticusfinch "Also telling Vaughan to get lower when Makinson jumped in the air AGAIN!!
I’m still baffled as to why Bell never received a lengthy ban for his assault on Ratchford. That was no accident.'"
You've got to be taking the with the bottom part. He was being swung around by one of your players with his arm flailing, and Ratchford directly behind him lmao. I don't even think its humanly possible for him to have done that on purpose. Ridiculous suggestion
|
|
|
|
|
|