I can see this from both sides. But for me. I see this as a net positive for the team and for the british game.
We become a bit more attractive again to possible superstars and players who wish to come and apply their trade at warrington. We are one of the teams they come to when doing these experiments. We always have led the way. Whether it was America in the 80s. The games we took on the road in the early superleague years. Or Vegas this time.
This is a net positive for warrington and the game (of handles well(

Funnily enough, I think for Warrington and Wigan it's more about building contacts with some of the movers and shakers in the NRL and getting access to that company more than it is about the USA.

I don't quite understand the criticism of the RFL in all this. It has been made very clear this has been organised by the two clubs involved, not an RFL or IMG initiative.

I see. I hope this goes some way to making an NRL takeover of SL more likely.

Not sure what benefit we or RFL we see from this. What is the primary objective?
Anyone who does go, make sure you use the opportunity to go an see the Grand Canyon... truly a wondrous, awesome experience.
And have breakfast at The Bellagio... wow!

I had a week at the Bellagio. The light/fountain show is fantastic but I got chucked out of the pool for playing with my 7 year old daughter and "making a noise".

I'm already booked to go to Vegas at the end of May next year, and I'm now seriously tempted to go twice in less than three months. I think it's brilliant that we're involved, and I know it's Wigan who led the way, but I'd rather they took us along for the ride than Saints, Leeds or whoever.

I realise it's not cheap to go (hence I'm still at the "tempted" stage rather than the "booked it" stage) but going to every single match isn't compulsory. I can't see any negatives to it.