FORUMS > Warrington Wolves > Centres |
![](images/sitelogos/2022-21.jpg) |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 2859 | ![](images/sitelogos/fullsize/21.png) |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2015 | 9 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Jun 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
|
Quote: jonh "Well they play different positions King is a right centre and Wardle is a left.
Ironic that Wardle fell out with Hudds because he was told he was going to play right and Kings perceived sulking and drop in form came when he was moved to the left.
As I said earlier of the 2 over the course of the year I think King has been most effective. Wardle though kicked on towards the back end of the year.
I’d have to go with King though personally as I think his contributions will be harder to replace. I don’t believe Keighran will be as effective as King from a team point of view, and we will have to change our style a little to accommodate him which has partly been the reason we have gone big on forwards in 2024.'"
King's best form (with us) was at left centre, he played right in his younger days as he was coming through first team, but see news article below.
https://www.warringtonguardian.co.uk/sp ... k-belongs/
I don't expect a centre like Inglis when discussing a 'Strike' centre. But I do expect a marquee centre to be able to create something themselves be that through power, pace, skill or a passing game. King does the tough stuff very well, is very good in yardage but he isn't a marquee centre - again not his issue, but it is something we have to contend with and consider when we look at having him back in the squad, which links back to your original question. Would you welcome him back on marquee wages?
|
|
Quote: jonh "Well they play different positions King is a right centre and Wardle is a left.
Ironic that Wardle fell out with Hudds because he was told he was going to play right and Kings perceived sulking and drop in form came when he was moved to the left.
As I said earlier of the 2 over the course of the year I think King has been most effective. Wardle though kicked on towards the back end of the year.
I’d have to go with King though personally as I think his contributions will be harder to replace. I don’t believe Keighran will be as effective as King from a team point of view, and we will have to change our style a little to accommodate him which has partly been the reason we have gone big on forwards in 2024.'"
King's best form (with us) was at left centre, he played right in his younger days as he was coming through first team, but see news article below.
https://www.warringtonguardian.co.uk/sp ... k-belongs/
I don't expect a centre like Inglis when discussing a 'Strike' centre. But I do expect a marquee centre to be able to create something themselves be that through power, pace, skill or a passing game. King does the tough stuff very well, is very good in yardage but he isn't a marquee centre - again not his issue, but it is something we have to contend with and consider when we look at having him back in the squad, which links back to your original question. Would you welcome him back on marquee wages?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5433 | ![](images/sitelogos/fullsize/21.png) |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Jul 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: Alffi_7 "Quote: Alffi_7 "but the 3rd marquee cannot be used on nil players can it it has to be uk based players it was about helping clubs retain players and stop them going to the NRL ?'"
One has to be used on a Fed trained player - we have that in Williams. We could therefore use teh other two spots on NRL marquee players if we wished. The ideal would be to have as many Warrington homegrown marquees as possible as they only count as £50k on the cap, £100k for fed trained (Williams) and £150k for NRL.
And this is all happening on the back of reduced sky funding & possibly lower gates if sky are planning to show all SL games & attract more stay at home fans & produce more sky profits.
Seems to me this plan could have more holes than a Swiss cheese.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 17092 | ![](images/sitelogos/fullsize/21.png) |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2008 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Jul 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
38352_1407962301.jpg Packs Win Games
Great Packs Make All Backs Look Class
#onceawirealwaysawire:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_38352.jpg |
|
| Quote: ninearches "Perhaps they have a more determined & professional set up at our rivals. We know we have beaten these teams but can't sustain a challenge. To be successful the whole club needs a kick up it's massively under performing booty. Let's hope Big Sam is the start of revival & not just another sticking plaster to attract fans because of his reputation.'"
It’s deeper than a kick up the ass.
We will always get up for a short revival every now and again, and a CC, but we will never have the annual consist top 3, unless we match them with the youth structure.
To allow Saints to pick up all those Wire lads for their academy was nothing short of impotent.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 10448 | ![](images/sitelogos/fullsize/21.png) |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Jul 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| All this marquee thing is just hiding the fact that the NRL is just growing and growing. 2 Billion 5 year tv deal and looking at possible 72 million on audience on main pay Channel when they play in Las Vegas. They have deals with 3 main broadcasters.
Seen a post today that concerns its self with IMG basically bending the rules to keep London in the league based on the criteria. End of if we don’t starting growing the game here and finding more funding the marquee rule will be a waste of time because the NRL are just going to to take the best of the talent from here because they can pay way above what we can offer. So London whatever a season they have need to stay and we need more southern teams.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
First Team Player | 1037 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2020 | 4 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Jul 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: rubber duckie "It’s deeper than a kick up the ass.
We will always get up for a short revival every now and again, and a CC, but we will never have the annual consist top 3, unless we match them with the youth structure.
To allow Saints to pick up all those Wire lads for their academy was nothing short of impotent.'"
When was this? Those a few years ago? Which ones are in St Helens first team now?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 17092 | ![](images/sitelogos/fullsize/21.png) |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2008 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Jul 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
38352_1407962301.jpg Packs Win Games
Great Packs Make All Backs Look Class
#onceawirealwaysawire:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_38352.jpg |
|
| Quote: karetaker "All this marquee thing is just hiding the fact that the NRL is just growing and growing. 2 Billion 5 year tv deal and looking at possible 72 million on audience on main pay Channel when they play in Las Vegas. They have deals with 3 main broadcasters.
Seen a post today that concerns its self with IMG basically bending the rules to keep London in the league based on the criteria. End of if we don’t starting growing the game here and finding more funding the marquee rule will be a waste of time because the NRL are just going to to take the best of the talent from here because they can pay way above what we can offer. So London whatever a season they have need to stay and we need more southern teams.'"
Too much self interest from Wigan.
Wigan have so much influence over other clubs, the game will never grow.
|
|
|
![](images/sitelogos/2022-21.jpg) |
|
![](images/sitelogos/2022-21.jpg) |