Crowther on what would be relatively low money or Currie stinking the place out for another 2 or 3 years on what I'd imagine will be a higher wage.. which are you taking?

Currie's extension was on a massively reduced wage,................................and he still isn't providing value for money!

Neither if I had a choice.

The furore around Crowther reminds me a lot of the side show around us signing Danny Halliwell in 2002. (for our older viewers).

I'm not doubting you but intrigued as to how you know with such surety?

A cab driver told me

Why have I got a picture of Jim from Taxi in my head, is that who Duckie is.

It wasn’t the Duck.
The Duck only quacks on here.

if i had to choose 1, I'm taking crowther.

The poor attempt at tackling Hellewell at Salford, which cost us a try, and then avoiding tackling Percival in the Saints game, when he could have prevented a try in the collision, have highlighted Currie`s commitment to the team.

He was doing it even when the team was winning at the start of the season. I've not forgotten his attempt at a tackle v Salford at home as he let sneyd waltz past him from 10 out without touching him. Currie has long had form for this sort of thing.

yup, and i got grief on here for saying i was going his testimonial game cos i was fed up with him and his attitude last year