Quote Wires71="Wires71"Powell was brought into make changes because our culture is not aligned to winning the GF. He is attempting to make those changes. If we stick with the same players and same ways we will get the same predictable result -> well paid nearly men who can get themselves up for a few games in a cup run every now and again when they choose.
This beatification of Cooper is crazy. He's played for Wire for 12 years under 3 coaches and we are as far away from the GF win as we ever were, the same went for Hill. Makes it sound like we are losing a talismanic leader.
We desperately need change. Whether it will work is another matter, but surely we have to give Powell the chance - he inherited a basket case where, it appears, the players had too much influence and played/trained when it suited them/when they could remember their passport.'"
It’s widely accepted by those with eyes in their heads that we had a 2 man pack for years, Cooper and Hill. It fell to bits when they went off. So… we get rid of them. Don’t get me wrong, it’s not Morley and Peacock, but there are very few tried and tested good props around. So instead of keeping the ones we have, that work, we ship them out and bring in journeymen and imports, of a similar age.
If we had signed some proper replacement to cover the 50+ minutes of effective work that both Hill and Cooper delivered consistently, I wouldn’t be concerned, but we have got Kasiano (great for 25-40 minutes), Dudson (no comment required), Philbin (effective for 25-40 minutes), Mikaele (untried and unproven, could be Sita reincarnated) Bullocks (bang average) and potentially Mulhearn, who somehow is the best of the pack.
We need change, to get a group of men who are capable of getting to finals, to WIN them. That was the job. If the players have too much influence on when they train, as set out above, that would (should) have been signed off at executive level. There is NO CHANGE at executive level, so those bad decisions have not been addressed. If the CEO has agreed with Cooper re his side business, then the CEO should honour that. If decisions of the CEO are failing the company, then the CEO should pay the price for those poor decisions.
To go from nearly men, to nearly bottom, is not acceptable. There’s cracking a few eggs for the omelette and there’s just tipping the carton upside down