You [iare[/i one of the’so-called lesser teams. Look below the glitter that Moran has so generously rolled your turd in and you’ll find that, despite all the chest beating and posturing, you’re still just Warrington.

He's been away for a while and THAT'S the best username he can come up with? Monikers getting as pitiful as his existence.

Seemed such an interesting and focused original post. Pity it went astray ... but no surprise.
1. Not sure our "best" left edge actually played together very much after the start of the season. i.e. Lineham, King, Widdop & Currie
2. I think Charnley is still pretty good given a ball 20 yards out with a tough job to do to get over the line. Our best winger (currenly on our books) in heavy traffic, close to line. In defence I think he was blamed too often for defensive problems caused inside.
3. Still very useful just a bit too casual for me at times. Looked very assured and in total control at hooker v.Cas. I still thought he played his best stuff at right centre ... I have a long memory it was some years back.
4. I can't see an obvious leader either. But lots of clubs are the same.
5. Yes we did miss his up and under at times. It was overdone so much ... but still useful.

No matter how much turd the troll rolls in he's still just a troll in a saints shirt covered in turd.

I'm sure it's a very fulfilling life though for someone spawned from that gene pool.

You're back from beyond the Mucky Mountains ,more incarnations than Doctor Who.

Is St Helens twinned with Gallifrey, as you've had more regenerations than Dr Who.
Apologies, Ninearches beat me to it.

What on earth have you found to complain about on this thread? Just posters exchanging their views.

Gene pool, in St Helens?
Have you seen a typical St Helens family tree?
They're very narrow.

That's what I mean, it's more of a Reed than a tree.

The attention seeking teenager puts it across in a bit of a manner which is all too mature for me, he does have a point.

Until we win the big one, we are just “also ran” names. Cas, Salford and Hull have just as much pedigree as us in the principal competition, which boils down to nothing unless you win it.

A cup win gives us a day in the sun, and we enjoyed it, but the sting should still be there when it comes to us not being a “big club” and the “it’s always your year”. We have taken that last one on as an ironic chant, but it’s embarrassing. Until we win it, those things should always sting, not just us but the players.

If we eventually do win superleague though, does that mean we need to be disrespectful to those other clubs as though we are lordly and they have no pedigree?

I'd like to think not, that would make us classless imbeciles like our visiting friend.

Let's not forget this is a sport where top clubs have had far too much power and principally that power has been held by the 3 sides that have won it the most, I believe its one of the main reasons the game is on its backside. There are barriers to other clubs winning that must be overcome, we have jumped most of those off field hurdles (by joining the club so to speak) just need to take the final step. Annoyingly we have wasted the last 3 years worth of opportunity with a hopeless head coach.