I know but just mean someone to take control of the game as well

So is anyone thinking that we had forwards available but didn't pick em?

Maybe resting them for Catalan cause they a big team and if we beat them takes the percentage down and ours up

It's a funny old game

But we do not need to rest 'em. I think we need to wait and see why we are so short of forwards. Unless you know I reckon best not to guess.
Philbin, Mulhern, Longstaff, Doro were never going to be rested.

Potential banana skin when Wakey sacked Chester so going with my instincts + 12 Wakey to tempting not to have a flutter on them + I’ll be doing the same on Cats the way this team is in + out.

Too many self imposed errors & lack of urgency in the first half that finished up having to be panic rugby in the 2nd half. No good saying we've saved ourselves for Thursday when this game should have been a banker. Well done Wakey !

You get two points for a win v Wakey and two vs. Cats.
I think we ought to hear from the Wire Club... what's happened to our forwards. It would clarify our thoughts a bit.

At least we have a coach willing to mix up the line up not just picking the same old favourites week in week out as we always had in the past.

It sends a tough message - you don't perform, you don't play, doesn't matter how big a name you are.

Genuine question, how much game time did Burgess get? please don't tell me we went with a 3 man bench again....

Hopefully something will come out to explain why we named only 19.
As Smiffy27 said, you only get 2 points for a win - be it Wakey or Cats - so if the players were rested then for me that's the wrong call.
I suspect maybe 'that that must not be named' could be the issue. If so it could be they'll be missing on Thursday too.
It does make this year's GF a bit of a lottery