What about Shadwells? I always thought they had more class & style than Barry Cooper.

I know about the club legend and that was an obvious and unremarkable sacking.
But which coaches (obviously 2 or more) did they sack after winning them the grand final.
What were the dates of the win and how soon after were they sacked? I will check up on this as it seems a strange way to reward success.

Hanley won it in 99 and was sacked in 2000. Millward won 2 and I think it took them a little longer to sack him. Either way, they weren't afraid to sack winning coaches if there was a better alternative out there.

Yes I'm well aware of that. I can't see money being an issue, I can't see his family being an issue given he lives around the corner. The only issue with Wane would be if he would want to come due to his Wigan ties but lets ask the question and find out.

You are dead right that they got sacked but ...
Ellery Hanley was sacked for a breach of contract & Millward for gross misconduct.
I thought it seemed a bit strange.

I know what you mean but he also has a track record of getting the best of his players which is the best attribute a coach can have IMO. For me Powell just doesn't like losing and that's not something I would be upset about in a wire coach because I don't like us losing either, he seems to get frustrated when injuries pile up etc, it could be argued we have a better squad depth than cas, so maybe injuries would be a little less frustrating for him. Maybe he could bring Trueman with him too? I think we missed a trick with Watson to be honest, I think he will go well for Huddersfield and would have loved to see what he could manage with our budget and young players.

Whoever comes in will be looking at a rebuilding job, hill and cooper aren't getting any younger and neither is ratchford, Jason Clark, gaz Widdop and inglis are likely to be off at the end of this season as well, and maybe Blake Austin too? There are some really good building blocks in place though already, daz Clark, King, lineham, Ashton, philbin, currie, mulhern? Butler? Plus I have really high hopes for riley Dean (really like the look of him), Longstaff, doro and josh thewlis. Thewlis could slot straight in to the team now and not look out of place. Whoever comes in is likely to have a large chunk of cap space to play with including marquee spots. I hope the appointment is confirmed early and then the coach and board can get to work on recruitment early.

Still a no on Powell for me sorry CW8, the over the top protestations when Westwood was genuinely a bit late on Gale a few years ago at their place had my all Keegan-esque in a losing a lot of respect kind of way.

I agree that there may be some merit in an early announcement of Price's replacement as it might ensure that the players definitely know that the guy making next season's plans is watching now

Hanley got the boot after going crazy and telling all saints sponsors they should pull their money from the club in the season launch dinner, and they picked millward up from leigh.

I don't think that's the best example for this one.

I'm not sure Saints have had great coaches. They have had a lot of great players. Look at the record of their coaches when they have been at other clubs...its not special. Daniel Anderson is the only one who I thought was a top coach.

It would have been interesting if Paul Cullen had taken over from Hanley instead of Millward. If he'd been the Saints coach through the 2000s how many trophies would he have won. Would a narrative have been created that we were stupid to allow Cullen to slip through our fingers and go to Saints and become a coaching great.

Leeds during the McLennan and McDermott era were also a team that didn't need a great coach, although McDermott was just right for that type of squad of big name players - he was able to command respect and authority over them which not many coaches could do.

It's been at Wigan, under Maguire and then Wane, where you can really point to a top coach making a difference. Wigan had some good players but not nearly as many as Saints or Leeds when they were winning Super Leagues.

What's the full story here? I don't recall ever reading it.

Here's a retro BBC report:

[urlhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sport/rugby_league/673959.stm[/url