Whoever appointed Fitzpatrick was either,

a) Trying to save money

b) Was pi$$ed

c) Both of the Above.

I'd also suggest that if it was neither A, B, or C, then that person shouldn't be anywhere close to the decision making committee for the next CEO.

Could Henderson or Anderson be our "Watson" sat right under our own noses? Time to roll the dice.

I've said on other threads I'd back Paul Anderson, absolutely no problem. As for Henderson I like what he was doing with London but it really depends on his dynamic with the players, if he's pally with them it won't work IMO. Anderson has the added benefit of really knowing all the youngsters we have coming through. I just really want a change, I'm bored of Karl Fitzpatrick as well.

K Fitz head down is deafening. Does he feel guilt and shame to some responsibility for the dismal season.
How much is his input into player recruitment?
I’m almost 100% sure Pricey wasn’t not responsible for the recruitment of Latu. Pricey was pretty consistent from Latu signing until now, he was lacking.

Gus Gould told out of form Latu to go and play in the easier SL to while he found fitness and resurrect his career, he recommended him to Warrington. It seems K Fitz took the worm, hook, line and sinker...
Feck off Gus Gould. Keep your rejects to yourself.

League Express are reporting that Henderson has been interviewed for the vacant head coach position at Salford.

Salford would do well with Henderson and if he got the job and they do really well and we don't, it would highlight Price even more as being the wrong man for the job.