Quote rubber duckie="rubber duckie"My point being 7th instead of 4th was progressing and none of us would have been disappointed had we finished 7th. Johns is irrelevant other than adding more expectations and lack or patience to the fans.'"
We would have been disappointed with 7th in 2005, given that we'd signed Gleeson, Fa'afili, Swann, Kohe-Love. We were 6th and in the playoffs in the last season at Wilderspool, so after moving to a new stadium with a lot of investment in new signings, having two seasons outside the playoffs while clubs like Wakefield and London had been getting in, would have stalled the momentum we were trying to build.
I think the 2005 season was crucial in the history of the club and in the context of us climbing out from the small-time mid-table mediocrity which we'd been in for a decade really since Davies, Bateman and Mackey left. We won 11 out of 13 games at one point which came to be more normal later under TS but I don't think we'd seen that sort of run since the year we finished jointed top. It was such a change to turn up to the HJ expecting to win, including when it was against Bradford, Wigan and Hull. We also played some great rugby in that time as well - the Swann/Gleeson/Fa'afili attack on the right edge; Briers and Wood in the halves, Danny Lima was in good form then doing similar to what BMM did in spells recently, and also we had Brent Grose in the form of his life from fullback (best fullback in the league that season). I really enjoyed that whole summer, the weather was good, England beat Australia in that great Ashes series, it was just a real feel-good time. Then we signed Johns and had all the excitement and momentum about that leading up to the playoffs.
Even though we underachieved in the next three seasons, the memories of that spell in 2005 gave some hope that the club did actually have potential to build something big and we saw a glimmer there of what it was like to turn up to the HJ and watch a team who you knew would play really good rugby, which we would see more regularly from 2010-13.
That was important in putting us on the map to the point where we could sign guys like Johns and Morley and Monaghan and King later, and have some credibility that we were trying to build something. Without a bit of success it would have been much harder for Simon Moran to sell a vision to players - look at what happened when Marwan Koukash was trying to stay credible after year after year of zero improvement at Salford.
I think a factor that really scuppered Cullen after 2005, wasn't the league schedule or the fact that he'd "overachieved" (I agree that is a thing...Shane McNally for instance got burned by taking Wakefield to the playoffs in 2004 when they massively overachieved, then got ditched far too early the year later), but the departure of Nat Wood, and us failing to land our top 2 targets (Matt Orford and Michael Monaghan) and having to scramble for a very poor replacement in Michael Sullivan. Not only was Sullivan a much less talented player but his whole attitude and commitment to the club was a million miles off what Nat Wood had been. Taking Nat Wood out of the dressing room took the spirit out of Cullen's team, we never had the same spark under Cullen once Wood was gone.