Honestly audio quality put me off before I listened to much of it.

Quite a few things could be done to clean up the audio.

Saying nothing.

I listened to about 5 minutes of the very first one, and switched off. I haven't had the slightest inclination to listen to any that followed.

I’ve got to agree with the posters above and I tuned out after two or three episodes.

It’s obvious that a lot of time and effort has gone into it and if the comments here are taken into account and it’s cut down to a sharp half-hour I’d happily give it another shot.

Personally I enjoy the pod. It took me a couple of goes to get into it but I rarely miss it now.

Admittedly I have the same sense of humour as the podders but I could see why it would grate if you don't.

I still think some of the comments on here are a bit OTT but hey ho.

My view is similar to yours. The lads must give up a lot of their time to compile the shows. I can see why it's not for everyone though as they can step over the line from time to time.

Don't get me wrong...yea I slated them because they haven't taken criticism and acted.
I appreciate the time and effort that is put in...but they still have turned out what I consider garbage.

RD's critique is totally correct. Given the time and effort the hosts are putting in, they may as well produce a good product as churn out something cringey.

As someone who has to navigate the commute to work in London and runs a lot, I consume a lot of podcasts, and you see a huge variety in quality. A good podcast can beat other forms of media - for politics and NFL I much prefer listening to the podcasts I subscribe to than the mainstream news which is soundbite-dominated. In a 40 to 60 min podcast you can get a level of interesting discussion that you just don't get from other media sources. But a lot of podcasts just fall flat. Other than issues around set up (poor sound quality is an immediate killer) the single biggest turn off to me is when the presenters spend time trying to be funny (especially with cringey humour), chatting about their personal lives, side jokes and whatever. The listener has downloaded the podcast to listen to someone discussing the topic of interest, not to hear about the hosts.

There are some really good football podcasts: my current two favourites are Nessun Dorma (90s football) and These Football Times. They are nostalgia podcasts talking about previous seasons, teams and players which is right up my street but they cut out the side talk and have some really interesting discussion with different viewpoints added. Another good fan-led podcast from another sport is Mile High Report (Denver Broncos), the hosts cut out any attempts to make themselves the focus of the show, they aren't trying to be controversial or have hot takes but offer interesting viewpoints that are worth listening to.

Just for a bit of balance, I quite enjoy the podcast and appreciate the time effort they put and am more than happy to hear their opinions on players and opposition. It is a bit long but as I am retired am not really bothered.
Many posters and readers’ on here think that many of RD’s posts are utter garbage but we still carry on reading what he has to say. Just hope he doesn’t continue to go on RedVee as it makes him as bad as Saddened & Co.

What have I done? I don't do the obvious trolling he does, this board is just very sensitive when it comes to fans of other teams it seems. I'm misunderstood.

I think you're alright. You don't care for me but that bothers me zero. Still think you're alright.

Everyone has a right to an opinion. I don't think it should be a personal one...not that it bothers me. Makes me laugh tbh.