| |
| FORUMS > Warrington Wolves > Tonight’s game v Saints. |
 |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Coach | 1484 |  |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Mar 2005 | 20 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2024 | Feb 2022 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
14240.jpg
:14240.jpg |
|
| Quote: Ruune Rebellion "St Helens under 19s have beaten Warrington 82-16'"
Ironically Warrington had a player sin-binned. They'll probably claim this was a turning point in the match and they could've won without it! | | |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 2840 | |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Oct 2005 | 19 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
18243.jpg
Ettinghausen's gone ice skatin':18243.jpg |
|
|
It was an even game and our attack is a long way behind saints but they didn't look like scoring either until John Elway got involved. Holbrook comments re Sita...completely unnecessary and inaccurate.
| | |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Captain | 4682 | |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jul 2015 | 9 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
74166_1608576718.jpeg
Just my opinions unless it's a FACT, in which case it's a fact.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_74166.jpeg |
|
| Quote: Saddened! "You can see why Warrington got the chant you did with the responses on this thread. A lot of you were convinced Saints were terrible and you were only second because you'd deliberately lost games, that our forwards were rubbish and your's much better. But for the second time this season you're beaten and scratching your heads. But now it's okay because it's all part of the master plan and if the game had been at Wembley or Old Trafford or if the mercurial Steffan Ratchford had been playing you'd have walked it?
The reality is you are second for a reason. You have clear deficiencies which, if they are not fixed, will mean you win nothing this season. Saints are currently better in every department, outside backs, halfbacks, front row, back row, bench, fitness, defense, attack, discipline. You are still a quality side and capable of improving and winning the double, but the arrogance on here is embarassing when probably none of you were even born when you lost won the top division.
I feel sorry for the few knowledgable supporters on here.'"
Wow the Donald Trump of St Helens speaks. I think it’s your lack of understanding that we should feel sorry for. Take your patronising tosh back to Redvee. | | |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Star | 3952 | |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Nov 2013 | 11 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2024 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: Saddened! "You can see why Warrington got the chant you did with the responses on this thread. A lot of you were convinced Saints were terrible and you were only second because you'd deliberately lost games, that our forwards were rubbish and your's much better. But for the second time this season you're beaten and scratching your heads. But now it's okay because it's all part of the master plan and if the game had been at Wembley or Old Trafford or if the mercurial Steffan Ratchford had been playing you'd have walked it?
The reality is you are second for a reason. You have clear deficiencies which, if they are not fixed, will mean you win nothing this season. Saints are currently better in every department, outside backs, halfbacks, front row, back row, bench, fitness, defense, attack, discipline. You are still a quality side and capable of improving and winning the double, but the arrogance on here is embarassing when probably none of you were even born when you lost won the top division.
I feel sorry for the few knowledgable supporters on here.'"
You beat us 3 times last season and then we won when it matters. It's not over yet. You needed to get away with one of the most blatant forward passes I've ever seen to win that game. Even so it was by 11, hardly a battering! on another night it could have gone the other way. I don't think yoy will find many of our fans who believe we are going to pick up silverware this season but it's far too early to write us (and Hull) off yet. | | | |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Captain | 4307 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Aug 2018 | 6 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: Saddened! "You can see why Warrington got the chant you did with the responses on this thread. A lot of you were convinced Saints were terrible and you were only second because you'd deliberately lost games, that our forwards were rubbish and your's much better. But for the second time this season you're beaten and scratching your heads. But now it's okay because it's all part of the master plan and if the game had been at Wembley or Old Trafford or if the mercurial Steffan Ratchford had been playing you'd have walked it?
The reality is you are second for a reason. You have clear deficiencies which, if they are not fixed, will mean you win nothing this season. Saints are currently better in every department, outside backs, halfbacks, front row, back row, bench, fitness, defense, attack, discipline. You are still a quality side and capable of improving and winning the double, but the arrogance on here is embarassing when probably none of you were even born when you lost won the top division.
I feel sorry for the few knowledgable supporters on here.'"
The definition of embarrassing is your response to the defeat on social media. | | |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Coach | 1781 | |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Apr 2005 | 20 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
14547_1406932719.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_14547.jpg |
|
| Quote: MorePlaymakersNeeded "The definition of embarrassing is your response to the defeat on social media.'"
Can I get a link? | | | |
| | |
|
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
3.71826171875:5
|
|
| POSTS | ONLINE | REGISTRATIONS | RECORD | | 19.65M +1 | 1,953 | 80,155 | 14,103 |
| LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.
When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
|
RLFANS Match Centre 
| Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1 | | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
| Wigan |
29 |
768 |
338 |
430 |
48 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
| Hull KR |
29 |
731 |
344 |
387 |
44 |
| Warrington |
29 |
769 |
351 |
418 |
42 |
| Leigh |
29 |
580 |
442 |
138 |
33 |
| Salford |
28 |
556 |
561 |
-5 |
32 |
| St.Helens |
28 |
618 |
411 |
207 |
30 |
| |
| Catalans |
27 |
475 |
427 |
48 |
30 |
| Leeds |
27 |
530 |
488 |
42 |
28 |
| Huddersfield |
27 |
468 |
658 |
-190 |
20 |
| Castleford |
27 |
425 |
735 |
-310 |
15 |
| Hull FC |
27 |
328 |
894 |
-566 |
6 |
| LondonB |
27 |
317 |
916 |
-599 |
6 |
| Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1 | | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
| Wakefield |
27 |
1032 |
275 |
757 |
52 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
| Toulouse |
26 |
765 |
388 |
377 |
37 |
| Bradford |
28 |
723 |
420 |
303 |
36 |
| York |
29 |
695 |
501 |
194 |
32 |
| Widnes |
27 |
561 |
502 |
59 |
29 |
| Featherstone |
27 |
634 |
525 |
109 |
28 |
| |
| Sheffield |
26 |
626 |
526 |
100 |
28 |
| Doncaster |
26 |
498 |
619 |
-121 |
25 |
| Halifax |
26 |
509 |
650 |
-141 |
22 |
| Batley |
26 |
422 |
591 |
-169 |
22 |
| Swinton |
28 |
484 |
676 |
-192 |
20 |
| Barrow |
25 |
442 |
720 |
-278 |
19 |
| Whitehaven |
25 |
437 |
826 |
-389 |
18 |
| Dewsbury |
27 |
348 |
879 |
-531 |
4 |
| Hunslet |
1 |
6 |
10 |
-4 |
0 |
|
