Quote: Wires71 "I am not interested in
1. Hearing the refs voice.
2. Hearing endless commentary about referees decisions.
3. Hearing a referee commentator (FFS how did it come to this)
4. Watching a replay screen on referee decisions.
I just want to see high impact, aggressive, fast, skillful, honest sport played by athletes amid fierce northern rivalry played on the cusp of the rules with no quarter asked or given.'"
1. I agree to a certain extent. Hearing his voice on tele - especially on Sky as there’s always about three people speaking at once in commentary at the same time - just gets mumbled up into a really poor outlay of voice noise with the match commentator. But I’d like to hear the ref when he’s speaking to the captain and when he sends something to the VR
2. I agree. Commentary - especially on Sky with any of around five people in the commentary gantry, sometimes a few speaking at once. And I want to hear simple commentary from the commentator and punditry about tactics; not continual hot topic conversations about rules and ref decisions
3. I agree we really don’t want need Cummings at all!
4. No harm in that for me, stops the possibility of corruption