I think to watch a match,analyse it prepare a presentation fit for TV twice each game,half and full time, and make sensible conversation with a random selection of knackered rugby players quite apart from some of the idiots in the box make Jon Wells OK for me !

Yeah I'm with this^^^^

I dont think Jon Wells is bad at all. ....he's probably keeping that spot warm for Sam Tomkins anyway. ..so be careful what you all wish for. ....

100% agree - don't understand the anti-Wells bitching on here.

Admittedly some of the segments with players are better than others, and if the player has nothing to say it dies a pretty painful death. But you get more understanding of what is happening from two minutes of those sections than you do in a full season of Stevo's contributions so it has to be an improvement on that.

He is a decent broadcaster and stays clear of the blatant favouritism of his colleagues - he will do for me.

Sam Tomkins Knows what he's talking about as one of the best players in the game. He's Calm and talks well in front of a camera. Unlike Jon Wells. Sam Tomkins could very much end up our games best pundit when he retires. A bit like Gary Neville.

Because he hasn't got a clue on what he's rambling on about! He invents plays in his head and then trys to pass them off as a set in stone thing, all whilst there's a player looking at him with an expression that says 'I haven't got a fudging clue what you're going on about...'

Brian Carney asked him a simple question a few weeks back about his 'game breaker' and he genuinely couldn't answer it. He started tapping that screen of his but was selecting the wrong things. he got himself that worked up he just stood there shouting out random buzz words like 'settler', '3 on 2' and 'nominating'. until Carney must have got a message or just used his common sense and moved him onto the next topic.

I wouldn't mind but he was asked a question on something HE HAD BROUGHT UP. He is an absolute buffoon.

The sky team needs a complete clear out and start again. Barry, Terry and at a push Phil Clark (for all his bias) are the only ones who actually talk about the game, say what they see and offer constructive comments. As opposed to Eddie, banging on about how Stevo had a Sunday roast the other day but he didn't like it because he ordered his beef well done and it came back pink.

Utter shambles.

Sorry laa, but you've just lost all credibility making that statement.

In what way Cat?

My favourite was when we pasted Leeds at home, and all i heard from the Sky lot was 'oh dear, poor Leeds. Sinfield, Leuluai, Peacock. Flooded training pitch'. They might have said 'good try' once about us but that's about it

Leeds had a flooded training pitch? I don't remember hearing about that!!

Sky glossed over that, like
the Wigan injury list
The return of Flower after his 10 match ban
The Stains hoodoo over Warrington
The return to Wigan of Ratboy, after his success in NZ
LMS

The Gruesome Twosome are doing a book signing at Waterstones, next Saturday. Stephenson should remember to finish colouring his in, before he signs it.

Do I hope that a heavy dictionary falls from a high shelf, onto his fat Yarkshire head? Do I ever.