Why would we have offered Jm a new deal?
He had a year left and was released,bridge also past his best and was to the back end of last year,he may have fallen out with the club,but I put my well earned money into a couple of his testimonial events,
He should have at least had the decency to attend yesterday if not just for the fans.

I haven't posted very much on here lately because of some of the absolute rubbish being posted, but this one just about takes the biscuit. Joel had a full year left on his contract, so would not have been offered a new one on reduced terms. If you're going to post blatant lies, at least try to get at least some of your facts right.

I also noticed that, but I've been struggling to think of a Super League club that he would feasibly be signing for. The only ones I could come up with were Salford and Wakefield as everyone else is either too good or has half decent halves. I'd have thought Salford might have ideas above GOB, with no disrespect to him. Tim Smith is presumably on the way out of Wakefield.

MH CB offered one year deals on roughly half of current deal JM offered one year extension again on roughly half, as for the poster who said current players would be glad to see Bridge move on why ? He is one of the most popular lads there

I don't think Saints would turn their noses up at Gareth O'Brien. He is very highly regarded among Saints fans & i'm sure Longy could bring the best out of him so they don't need to keep signing injury prone Aussies.

You still haven't answered why Joel would be offered a 1 year extension when he was still on contract. Stop making it up.