Quote fez1="fez1"Very good article.
I would go for (and was disappointed when they scrapped it) the U23's.
It potentially gives the 19's 4 more years to develop.
I don't know the finances involved but I would have thought you could have had a spending cap. I don't know how it currently works but for me the U23's should be a mixture of part and full timers.
The full timers are those on the fringe of the main squad / returning from injury and the part timers those still developing.'"
When would this mixture of full-time and part-time players train? Would the part-timers play at this level or at championship level? Where are all these extra players going to come from?
You wouldn't need a "spending cap", there are few enough teams in SL that can afford their first team squads let alone over-spend on a u23's squad.
How would a club afford to run three match day squads per weekend, u19s, u23s and first team.
Answer for me would be not to return to promotion/relegation for the reasons Smith gives and for the dual-registration/partnership clubs to work on the basis Warrington and Swinton operated it. That would give any Super League squad player not playing Super League a competitive game each week.