Quote: sally cinnamon "Hodgson was a better fullback than Radlinski or Wellens though.'"
I'm not 100% in agreement with that.
Ultimately it depends what you want from your team. If you want a third pivot, then Hodgson does a great job of that. Radlinksi and Wellens were both different players and in certain teams (ie ones with enough creativity in the halves and loose forward) I would select Radlinski or Wellens for those teams.
I liked Hodgson, but I think the quality of his play was overstated. Some of his 1 on 1 defence was laughable, his kick return could be very weak and slow and his error count could be extremely high. Of course he had a lot of benefits, his calmness and maturity really helped us over the last few years, and his pass selection was usually of the highest order as was his timing coming into the line.
It will be interesting to see what happens now without this style of fullback in the team but if I'm honest I was already preferring the faster and more elusive Ratchford at 1 when he played there and I'm looking forward to seeing Russell.
Hodgson was a very good player and we should appreciate what he did for the team, but he was nowhere near perfect. I should clarify that I saw little of his career before he came to SL so am only judging him on the latter years of his career.