It wouldn't be the second half. It would be 23 matches in your 12, followed by an extended playoff series of 7 matches, then semis and a final. So actually you'd know what 76% of your fixtures would be up front.

Andy Gatcliffe made Warrington's position clear back in early August: www.warringtonguardian.co.uk/spo ... ney__RFL_/ I'm guessing since then the RFL haven't provided any answers to the questions he posed. Certainly the review document they issued didn't. They have also failed to deliver a taker of the naming rights to the World Cup despite it receiving exposure on free to view tv channel - the RFL is not fit for purpose.

Andy Gatcliffe made Warrington's position clear back in early August: www.warringtonguardian.co.uk/spo ... ney__RFL_/ I'm guessing since then the RFL haven't provided any answers to the questions he posed. Certainly the review document they issued didn't. They have also failed to deliver a taker of the naming rights to the World Cup despite it receiving exposure on free to view tv channel - the RFL is not fit for purpose.

Appreciate that Huddersfield are not currently profitable, but Davy is reportedly well off and has invested significantly into them.

Significantly is an understatement isn't it?.With a "being generous' 5k home supporters thers no way could they be anything other than bottom dwellers without his money

I trust the people who own these clubs to make better commercial decisions than Brian Barwick.

To be fair to the RLWC2013 team (whilst technically part of the RFL and reporting to Nigel Wood), they are a seperate team who have done a great job and never intended getting a headline sponsor. They told us this 18 months ago. They feel the World Cup is a big brand in its own right and works better through attracting a range of sponsors - which to be fair is exactly what they have done.