FORUMS > Warrington Wolves > Attacking the knees |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 157 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2015 | Oct 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: Paullie "I'm getting really wound up with this 'I was always told to take the legs' garbage. Yes, kids are told to go for the legs first when tackling an oncoming attacker. Kids are NOT taught to take the legs while two of your own side hold the attacker in a upright position therefore rendering him a sitting duck.
Ok, so that type of tackle is currently legal, doesn't make it safe. Shoulder charges were legal last year but the powers that be saw fit to ban them as they have the potential for causing injury, this tackle should also be banned for exactly the same reason. Chicken wings were legal at one point as, I'm sure if you go far enough back, were spear tackles!!!
I'm also getting wound up with this 'that is the way that the knee bends so that tackle wont cause injury'. Well how do you control the subsequent fall to the ground? Taking the Ratchford tackle as an example, two defenders hold Ratchford up, Hansen takes his knees, the subsequent fall is ALWAYS going to be in a backwards direction from the knee up. This means that the weight of himself as well as the two defenders drop on the knee joint. This could result in the knee over extending, given that Hansens shoulder is directly behind the knee joint. Even if the shoulder wasn't there the ankle is at risk seeing is its immediately underneath the weight of three bodies with no movement. Of course Ratchford could always try to spin to avoid this crumpled heap but then, with stoods preventing his feet from rotating, the knee ligaments then become at risk.
Whichever way I look at it, going for anywhere in the leg area puts any immediate joints / bones at risk either a) directly from the tackle or b) from the subsequent fall.
This type of tackle needs banning immediately!
You must really get wound up at the dreadful unlawful penalty given as Angel Benny Westwood caressed Blake Green with a loving stroke accross his cheek in an effort to show him just how much he cares for him.....
Two wrongs don't make a right, but the Hansen tackle was unfortunate rather than deliberate. He did not attack the knee's but the leg got caught underneath.
The thug on the field was and usually is, Westwood, despicable player who brings shame to the sport. How do you justify that. Tell your kids its ok if the ref does not see it?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 32357 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
3076_1671446335.jpg SAINTS THE ORIGINAL AND PERENNIAL CHEATS
For sale full Saints kit (circa 1989). Shirts in pristine condition, but shorts badly soiled.
For 27 - 0 you get a trophy
For 75 - 0 you get sod all.
Wigan had eight in a row
Saints have five in a row:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_3076.jpg |
|
| Quote: mark_m "His failure to bend his back properly meant he didn't hit as low as he was certainly looking and intending to.'"
He bent his back as far as he needed to make a legal tackle around the hips. Ratchfords damage is to his ankle ligaments. I don't know if he was wearing blades but they appeared to get stuck in the turf as he felt the force of the tackle. The cannonball tackle is usually one from the side that hits the knee/lower leg, Hansens certainly wasn't one of those.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 195 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2013 | 12 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2013 | Oct 2013 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
Fish_PDT/PDT_Fish_33.png :Fish_PDT/PDT_Fish_33.png |
|
| Quote: Rogues Gallery "He bent his back as far as he needed to make a legal tackle around the hips. Ratchfords damage is to his ankle ligaments. I don't know if he was wearing blades but they appeared to get stuck in the turf as he felt the force of the tackle. The cannonball tackle is usually one from the side that hits the knee/lower leg, Hansens certainly wasn't one of those.'"
-legal tackle or not ,if you watch it back you can actually see the *intent* in his eyes when he went in for that *tackle* on a player who was not only already held in the first tackle , but was also--stationary-- at the time of the second *tackle* !sooner that type of tackle is banned the better imo.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 993 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2011 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2024 | Sep 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
63644_1343901350.jpg [color=#FF0000:3s5hr9kj]Have you noticed, you can never find a radical priest when you need one.[/color:3s5hr9kj]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_63644.jpg |
|
| Quote: he was never offside "-legal tackle or not ,if you watch it back you can actually see the *intent* in his eyes when he went in for that *tackle* on a player who was not only already held in the first tackle , but was also--stationary-- at the time of the second *tackle* !sooner that type of tackle is banned the better imo.'"
I’m not going to get too involved with the Hansen tackle debate because it doesn’t seem to be getting anywhere and just seems to be divided on which club you support lines, having said that I must say that your “you can actually see the *intent*in his eyes” is the most bizarre reasons for thinking there was any malice intended. I can only say like everyone else if a player does a tackle deemed bad enough to be classed as career ending to another player, that player should have the proverbial book thrown at him. End of.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 142 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2013 | 11 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Jul 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
70714_1369740335.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_70714.jpg |
|
| Quote: Enicomb "Let's just ban tackling as it can easily cause injury; see J. monaghn.
Just as stupid an argument as you lot whinging about a legal tackle to the hip/lower back. Talk of a shoulder charge! Hardly surprisising you don't know the meaning of that either seeing as how so many of you saw two tacklers on Ratchford before Hansen tackled him.'"
Go away you strange fellow.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5510 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Hanson's effort to grab any part of Ratchford's lower limbs was feeble to say the least & he actually made contact with the shoulder on Ratch's back/hip ,the shoulder then slid down towards Ratch's knees & Hanson's arms missed the legs altogether.
|
|
|
|
|
|