I dont know how to quote properly.......

But yeh there was no frame where it showed clearly he had his foot in touch before he got the ball down.......so it is BOD, well at least that is what ive come to believe

I thought the frame in which he had his foot on the line before the ball was grounded was fairly clear. Other than that one, you're right.

Sorry jaj, mate, but it was pretty clear. From now on, don't listen to anything that Eddie or Stevo say. They're fooking clueless

gonna watch super league full time tonight to see what bill 2 names arthur terry oconnor and john kear say on the matter...or matters...

Well, if your're going to bring BOD into the situation, may I humbly request we also ask
Aunt Flo
PC Copper
Farmer Barleymow
and Alberto Frog and his amazing animal band....mmmmmm, what flavour milkshake???

just googled that... WTF?

Only 13 episodes were ever made of BOD.

unlucky

Too many users who post on these forums regurgitate those two imbeciles ramblings believing them to be fact rather than think and form their own opinions based on what they see, not what they're told.

Have just had Sky Sports for two weeks now, after a long absence, and cannot believe how silly the commentary is, and rather than commentate on the game, constantly give their uninformed opinions on this that and the other.
They see similar incidents in different ways, depending on which team is involved. The "shadow" on the line was a peurile attempt to justify a try for Bulls, and the ludicrous attempt to justify Riley's "obstruction" was not only nonsensical, but showed a lack of knowledge of the rules.
As for Phil Clarke, words fail me. I have met him on a couple of ocassions and he is a really nice bloke, but his lack of skills as a neutral pundit is woeful. Grrrrrrrrr!

Swear filter ?