Quote: the flying biscuit "Ronnie Duane was a Great Britain international and Mark Roberts Made Andy Gregory look like the best player in the world. They both played well over a hundred games..... hardly Mythical!
Keith Holden maybe I can see your point as he joined us as an unknown but he was a direct replacement for Andy Gregory and filled his shoes with ease with all fans raving about how good he was, added to the fact John woods would have been his stand off partner for the next three seasons its easy to say what might have been.... Holden barely played a year before doing his ankle...that was a massive loss
I'm not a city fan but wasnt Paul Lake poop....'"
Fair points re Duane and Roberts.
As for Paul Lake I think he was good but now its hard to remember how good he was.
He was on the fringes of the England squad and seen as an outside bet for Italia '90 but he didn't make the squad. Then he did his knee ligaments early the next season, and from then he was always on the comeback trail and never made it back. To the City fans he was always the Great White Hope, when he came back, he was going to take City to glory he was that good. At school there would be arguments like 'who's better, Ince or McAllister' and then some City fan would pipe up that a fit Paul Lake was better than Ince, McAllister, Platt, Wise, Keane, Gazza, Clough, any of them.
I think what people liked about Lake was he wasn't a bog standard 'high work rate' midfielder, he was a ball player with a lot of skill and he played fullback, sweeper as well as midfield. But I've seen him described as "potentially the lost England captain through the 1990s" and I don't know if that's an exaggeration. The other young emerging midfielder at that time was David Rocastle who looked quality when he started out at Arsenal but by his mid 20s had fizzled out, had he got injured in his youth like Lake did he might have been regarded in the same terms as what might have been.