| FORUMS > Warrington Wolves > Tomkins 'Kick' |
 |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 36 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Apr 2010 | 15 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Sep 2011 | Sep 2011 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: jdrocket "I am gonna take slim (I think)'s advice and stop replying to obvious pie trolls.
However, I am glad you concede you are a hypocrite. The more alarming thing is you have so far compared hock (a drug taking thug) with one of this countries best exports and agreat example of the game, a stand out player who's only crime is getting drunk and imitating a sexual act on a dog. (I'm sure there are many on here who have done more than imitate with some right dogs. Also I never said I had done worse but I am a bit of a prune amd don't binge drink. However it was harmless. No one was hurt [not even the dog]) and jon clarke who is a great servant of rugby league and went to prison at a very young age and has more than paid his due to society.
As I have said when I disagree with a decison made by the club, that also defies my ethics (as you claim your club has done) I will be a man of my principles and take action. I will not implicently sit back a pay the club, while also claiming the high ground. You can not do that, sorry. It makes you a hypocrite.
Sorry Mr Sanctimonious, you just cant get your head around the fact that your team (like others) has some ne'r do wells plying their trade within it.
You really do have bad eyes if you think that JM was imitating. You dont have to look to hard on the web to see what happened.
An abysmally immoral act, but hey he plays for Warrington so its ok. Where are your wonderful ethics now?
Think its time you looked a bit deeper in your own back yard.
Hock was stupid and should have been finished off, but unfortunately he wasnt, by, incidentally higher authority than Wigan. What I can do about that, eh?
There are others playing right now in Super League who have been banned for drug taking. A cursory sweep of your boards history shows no such venom towards them. Why? Because they dont play for Wigan? Are all the fans of their clubs hypocrites too?
Perhaps you are just a Wigan hater, with nothing else in your life, stroking your white cat in your armchair, sporting a gnarled expression.
And a massive hypocrite. Follow your own advice.
Go and burn your shirt. 
|
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Star | 3869 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jul 2010 | 14 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Aug 2016 | Oct 2012 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
51898_1347989911.png
"Come, follow me, and I will show you how to fish for people!" Matthew 4:19
Things I learned on 11/08/12
Gareth Hock can't pass
Gareth Hock can't run
Gareth Hock can't fight
[url=http://www.dailystar.co.uk/rugby/view/256856/Gareth-Hock-relives-drugs-ban-hell/:22njixh9]I'm assured he can snort a line of coke the size of a Mecca dauber though.[/url:22njixh9]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_51898.png |
|
| Quote: piemuncher "
I will and try and make this simple for you. I will synthesize everything I have said into bullit points!
You said you don't think hock should ever play again and yet you still pay to see him and support the boards decision to employ him. Therefore you are a hypocrit!
I don't have a problem with anything morely, monas or clarke has done (you can claim I'm biased; I don't care. It will be your opinion) therefore I have no reason to stop supporting the team or buying their tat. So... Not a hypocrite.
You have a problem with the above people. So when/if wigan sign them or they do a forum or something, if you continue to support them you'd be a... Yeah that's right, a hypocrite.
Cleared that up? Good!
|
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Star | 3869 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jul 2010 | 14 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Aug 2016 | Oct 2012 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
51898_1347989911.png
"Come, follow me, and I will show you how to fish for people!" Matthew 4:19
Things I learned on 11/08/12
Gareth Hock can't pass
Gareth Hock can't run
Gareth Hock can't fight
[url=http://www.dailystar.co.uk/rugby/view/256856/Gareth-Hock-relives-drugs-ban-hell/:22njixh9]I'm assured he can snort a line of coke the size of a Mecca dauber though.[/url:22njixh9]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_51898.png |
|
| Quote: piemuncher "
I will and try and make this simple for you. I will synthesize everything I have said into bullit points!
You said you don't think hock should ever play again and yet you still pay to see him and support the boards decision to employ him. Therefore you are a hypocrit!
I don't have a problem with anything morely, monas or clarke has done (you can claim I'm biased; I don't care. It will be your opinion) therefore I have no reason to stop supporting the team or buying their tat. So... Not a hypocrite.
You have a problem with the above people. So when/if wigan sign them or they do a forum or something, if you continue to support them you'd be a... Yeah that's right, a hypocrite.
Cleared that up? Good!
|
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 36 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Apr 2010 | 15 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Sep 2011 | Sep 2011 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: jdrocket "
Not really but hey ho, its just hard to get through to you that I can see faults in players and you obviously cant - if they play for Warrington.
BTW I do know what Clarke did, and it shouldnt be mentioned in the same breath as Hock or JM.
He is a decent bloke is Clarke, has been a great servant for Warrington and I always like to see him do well whenever the Wolves are on the box. I met him once at a kids do at Wigan, and he handled himself very well considering what he had just been through.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Owner | 5750 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Oct 2003 | 21 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Feb 2020 | Feb 2020 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
7349_1382076828.jpeg
CHAMP20NS:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_7349.jpeg |
|
|
Neither taking recreational drugs or performing sexual acts on dogs have anything to do with what you do on the rugby pitch, yes, it should be dealt with by the club on a personal level but to say "ban them for life" is ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Coach | 13016 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Oct 2004 | 20 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2015 | Sep 2012 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
10347_1278884845.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_10347.jpg |
|
| Quote: 21-12 "Neither taking recreational drugs or performing sexual acts on dogs have anything to do with what you do on the rugby pitch, yes, it should be dealt with by the club on a personal level but to say "ban them for life" is ridiculous.'"
What did Moz have to say about it? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
