You can always turn up the collar, put some 70's shades on - and do an Elvis!

Like the home shirt that was originally shown and would have bought that one, Hate the market stall version the club is selling as a supposed replica ! it isn't a replica as it isn,t the same shirt design same colours nearly what a load of crap our club is dishing out as quakity merchandise and at £45 a pop a rip off a right bunch of Arther Daley's they are !
Profits will be down if something isn't done so get a grip Gatcliffe !

Did people expect any thing else with the kits? Look at last seasons player shirts compared to the supporters. I have no problems apart from the 'square' style as I only require a small, but its a wide as it is long!

The two shirts are similar but not identical where they should be ie. in the hoop patterns. different collar fine but the shirts should be pretty close.

What annoys me is not ISC as they only produce what the club wants but the club who actually say yeah that looks good.

I do hope we can get it right for 2012.

We want to be good on and off the field

anyone had any touble with things fading or falling apart like the 2010 shirts? my 2010 shirt now has no sponsor etc etc im not buying one till im sure its all fine

you are spot on....!!!



this is the last replica I bought and what I still wear to matches....it looks EXACTLY like what the players wear from the collars to badges to sponsors logo's. Its been to Wembley TWICE the south of France once, it had a brush with a blue sock in a washing machine once, but it still looks immaculate..... probably cost £35 when new....



and this is the one I bought before that....again well worn well washed still looks brilliant and an exact replica of what the players wear...


So I'm prepared to spend my money but i'm not a fool
if Andy Gatcliffe can explain how that rag in the club shop is value for money then he's a genious

The quality of all the shirts Canterbury did for us were excellent, still made in China like the ISC shirts but of a much higher standard.

That is one of the reasons why it's disappointing to be with ISC now, the other is that I know how great ISC Australian club shirts are in quality.

If supporters aren't happy they should complain and explain the reasons why they're not buying the shirt(s) the club will then need to go back to ISC and hopefully a better version will be made as the club won't want to lose out on revenue due to a poor product.

Got an email from Warrington a couple of weeks ago. I always get the newsletter twice, at same time so more inclined to delete both without reading but this is a survey I got.
Fill it in.

The club will continue to lose out on shirt sales while they offer us this ISC tripe. I love my club but I won't be ripped off by buying a shirt for £45 that obviously cost less than £5 to make. Get rid of ISC, and improve the quality by employing a proper supplier similar to the standard offered by the late
Canterbury europe.

So what you're saying is:-

- you bought one shirt that lasted ages and that was great value for money
- you bought another shirt that lasted ages and that was great value for money
- you've not bought this shirt, and so have no idea how long it will last, but you are still convincned that it isn't value for money.

I don't get it.

I understand that it doesn't look exactly like the players version. But why does that mean it's not value for money and/or is likely to disintegrate when it comes into contact with human hands?