I thought you were allowed 3 overage players in the under 20's this year as opposed to last year when you were allowed 8??

You could name 17 over-age players this week. They don't have a game.

I didn't mention this week. I was referring to your comment on Chris Hicks being 32 and the couple of issues on him not playing in the under 20's.

Mathers
Riley
Bridge
King
Hicks

although I would prefer to see Hicks at FB King move to the wing and Atkins in the

Basically Paul's wrong but he hates to admit it.... there's no issue at all with him playing in the reserves, next week the week after or next month.

I think you will find that the original suggestion was that Hicks gets game time in the reserves so he'd be better prepared for the Bradford and Saints games.

The key point was that there is no game this week to allow this.

The reference to being 32 was a snide dig but I'm allowed that today for keeping stum elsewhere.

I see somebody has been editting their post.

This point scoring and and silly squabbling is pathetic.

Mathers is the weak link and should miss out

But still incorrect.

And Riley can play full-back with Mathers being injured with Hicks on the wing and we can all be friends again:

[urlhttp://www.warringtonwolves.org/wolves-set-for-crusaders--3182[/url

all thanks to Tony Smith.