HAHA. yes, of course. seeing as though king was pushing him back and gleeson ran into him deliberatley. Gleeson knows what he was trying to do. and suceeded. NO TRY.

I do not deny Gleeson did not know what he was doing I am sure he did, but in that situation he did not have the prerogative to get out of the way and nor should he.

Clearly a try, the scoreboard says so, the ref says so and every non bias fan with a grasp of the rules of the game would also agree.

now you're saying King tackled Gleeson?

King maybe could of stopped the try if he wasn't deliberatley taken out by Gleeson.

In your opinion what should Gleeson have done? stopped supporting the ball carrier?

What should he have done? Stopped running??

What should he have done? Stopped playing?

Sorry, was feeling left out.

I didn't say that. Good support play is not running and obstructing a defending player.

so i ask again what should Gleeson have done? Should he have run out of the way giving King a clear shot at the tackle?

How many games of RL have you actually seen? Because you're coming across like this was your first TBH.

If the boot were on the other foot regarding the Gleeson incident and it had been Warrington scoring the try instead of Wigan. In the exact same circumstances i would have been mightily hacked off if the try had been disallowed.

It always puts a better perspective on the incident if you think of your team as the so-called sinners, not the sinned against.