We all know that we are currently up to the cap so what Mr Gatcliffe says is true.

However, everyone knows that things could change and if one or more players were to leave then there would be room on the cap.

This is a complete non story.

If the club want to confirm that the squad is complete for 2010 then why not just say that there will be no further departures or additions to the 2010 squad and we go with what weve got?

So well known to seemingly idiots like you that some may say it was "nailed on" just like you reckoned Sinfield was.

So the Mr/Mrs "she-male" Natters what has happened to the "nailed on" Sinfield signing?

Maybe Sinfield was all set to come after a well publicised altercation with Peacock, but Leeds wanted Vinnie Anderson as part of the deal so negotiations ended?

1) Saints will not let Graham go: why should they, and why should he want to move?
2) Carvell has been an excellent signing for the club and I don't see that Graham would be a significant improvement. The only thing Graham has going for him is age, but we've got Mike Cooper and others coming through who are even younger.

What about the Welsh?