Shocking attack but a lot of the ravings are from Hull FC fans. They have very selective memory loss. The attack by Raynor on a doorman and then trying to gouge the poor blokes eyes out. Should Raynor have been sacked. Should the RFL have banned him. Thuggery is not wanted in our sport but the punishments must be consistent. The courts are too lenient but how can the RFL now try and step in when in the past they have let shocking head high tackles go unpunished and still do.

SLIM PUTS HIS SOAP BOX AWAY SHEEPISHLY, after being missled on several issues!

Just read on the BBC site that KR have suspended him without pay until June

rlHererl

what messages does that send out to the kids,not only did he not get a custodial sentance but now he keeps his job, sorry but as a mother i think that it is all wrong(ex soldier or not he did wrong)it really makes me angry are sentancing laws in this country are all wrong..

ive been interested reading some of the posts on here and the majority are for him to be sacked. i just wonder why people are saying that hes received his punishment for the crime (whether that suited the crime or nots a different thing) but the courts have spoken and chosen not to give him a custodial sentance, therefore why should he be double punished and loose his job and livelihood.

i could also name a few more higher profile players from over years who have been involved in trouble with law and convicted yet they werent sacked. so why should they have or will be allowed to keep the jobs??