"but recovered to play a pivotal role in Great Britain's Test series win over New Zealand. "

Started all three tests.

And?

and played fairly well in all 3. Was quiet on Saturday but was good in the first 2 tests.

So, he played a pivotal role didn't he. If he'd only played in say 1, or a couple of sub appearances, he'd have been on the periphary.

Given the number of players that played in the series, what with players 'rested' & dropped, he must have done something right.

It doesn't matter though does it 'dredd', your blinkered hatred of Glees' goes before anything.

Pivotal-'Being of vital or central importance; crucial' and that describes Gleeson in the tests does it?

Todays made up fact.

A Warrington fan slagging off one of his own is bad enough, but slagging off one of his own that happens to be one of the best centres in the world....

Either that or you aren't a Warrington fan, in that case, your opinion means about as much as Graham Appo

No it isn't. He's always the person you 'attack'. (In the loosest sense.)

So looking at a players performance objectivily is slagging him off? I happen to believe that you don't have to take a blinkered view of a team to be a fan.

I assure i do not have a "blinkered hatred of Glees'", so yes it is a made up fact.