Quote morleys_deckchair="morleys_deckchair"Westwood in the clear... no charge www.warringtonguardian.co.uk/spo ... llow_card/'" I think we're very lucky there.

Quote morleys_deckchair="morleys_deckchair"Westwood in the clear... no charge www.warringtonguardian.co.uk/spo ... llow_card/'" I think we're very lucky there.

[iPlayer makes secondary contact with head of opponent however initial contact is with arm/chest of opponent. Player’s feet only leave the ground after contact. Sin Bin Sufficient.[/i

probably looked worse than it actually was live.... to me it looked like he jumped in and close lined him.. obvioulsy not

haurauki has been charged for his cannon ball tackle on currie, you know the one silverwood didn't see anything wrong with, even though it was really REALLY obvious.

Yes, it did look pretty bad at the time.

That is good to see. 11,864 people saw it and a good proportion of them voiced their feelings. One person didn't see it.

Good. Looks like the folks at Red Hall saw Tony's interview in the WG.

I would really like to see Bennys 'head tackle' again.
At the time I thought it was a certain red card, when the Ref only gave Benny a yellow then I thought a ban would follow.

Did the panel manage to miss Hauraki's shoulder charge to O'Brien's head ?

Penalty sufficient. Committed to making tackle by making a wrapping motion.......whatever that means.

I was really worried when Benny made that tackle , as it looked pretty bad. Think it was a good job that it didn't all kick off and Benny seemed to stick his hands up which helped situation . Good decision by ref and red hall.