I will give you my two-penneth. After 40 years watching RL I lost all faith in the sport months ago and I haven't been to a game this year. It's hard to accept but it's always going to be a small sport with a small mentality and full of people only interested in what suits their club. I feel the sport is predictable, flat and is sadly getting left way behind other comps and sports. I think people are wise to this feud between the RFL and Salford and aren't going to be a victim of it anymore. Fortunately I'm over it all now and can't even be bothered watching Superleague on TV either.

Sure will be an interesting game v the Bulls.

The town is back.

I reckon you can hear cries of joy emerging from Widnes and West Yorkshire.

Theredshed: I have only known you as a sensible & informative poster & supporter for many years, however having watched the club for a similar time scale I have reached the same point as you

Don't even attempt to think for me, you have enough trouble spelling simple words like 'being'.

Toddle back to the Nutjob forum you 2 faced idiot.

The "teacher" returns.

Hopefully time to move on now.
Two panels have found Salford to have breached the rules. The first imposed what they saw as a reasonable penalty. The appeal has upheld this.
The club should breeze through the middle 8s (although you could still avoid this) and seem well set up for next year. A close season with more stability and a couple of quality signings and I think you will be top 6 next year.

Whilst I agree that all is not perfect with the RFL, his constant berating of the organisation that runs the game is also doing us no favours. Given that coaches are fined for the slightest criticism of referees, it seems odd that he is allowed to deride the RFL at every turn and no action is taken.

This is a comment that your professional capability will allow you to shoot me down: he has a different postion from coaches in that he is speaking as "Joe public" and they have a professional role within the RL structure. I know he is the owner but look it as this: if I had shares in Salford, would the comments I make in public (e.g. on the terrace) mean I could be fined whereas if I did not have shares I could not be fined?

As you say: please a period of quietude. I don't think we've had one since 2009. (and it could have been 2008: Alkergate was when?)

Marwan was at LSV last weekend boasting he had found the missing email in relation to this matter and would get the six points back. What a clown?

You p r i c k Widnes are well out of it

Just posted in the VT that, although I missed the start of the Wire v Salford game tonight, I did hear the pundits mention that in an interview at the start of the programme Dr MarwanK would not state whether or not he would be at Salford next year and that he would speak about it with family at the end of the season.

Obviously this could have devastating repercussions for the club's future.

I hope for Salford's sake that he remains at the Club.