FORUMS > Salford Red Devils > Dr Cash gets his first "trophy" |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 987 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2016 | Sep 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
A.Marshall: |
|
| Quote: Red John "It's not that I 'enjoy' franchising, just that I accept that for the time being, given the massive disparity between the full-time clubs and the part-time ones, it's the best system we have. It elevates clubs into the full-time competition based on an analysis of the club as a whole over a suitable period. This, in turn, allows clubs to plan over a three year period rather than just live year to year. This doesn't make it a closed shop though, does it? To answer the question you won't answer, there have been [ino[/i occasions when the three yearly licence review has led to the maintaining of the status quo. Not one. That's a strange 'closed shop' isn't it?
However, ideally, yes, the money should be spread more evenly throughout the game, the gap shouldn't be so great and there should be automatic P&R, but the sport doesn't have sufficient funds to do that. If we spread the relatively meagre Sky money more evenly, how many clubs would still be able to spend up to the full salary cap? And when clubs can't afford to pay top players what those players (or their agents) perceive to be the 'going rate', we run the risk of losing them to the wealthier NRL or RU.
That right there is the problem. Rugby League doesn't exist in isolation and, perhaps uniquely amongst sports, faces stiff competition for its primary resource - its players - from a more cashed up rival sport and from an equally more cashed up rival competition within the same sport.
And sitting beneath that is the primary problemdoes[/i come into the sport, he gets criticised by fans of other clubs). That problem needs to be solved before we bring back P&R. Unfortunately, the clubs or the governing body or whoever made this ridiculous decision has decided to ignore that particular elephant in the room and, instead, concentrate on bringing in a system that drops a full-time club into a part-time competition with the associated massive reduction in funding and the inevitable complete restructure of the staff, while, on the other tapered end of this particular turd, elevating a part-time club into a full-time competition where it can, in all likelihood, flounder for a year and present a guaranteed four points to each of the other clubs in that competition (six to the one that meets them in the Magic Weekend) before dropping back down again, laden, no doubt, with a big bunch of debt. And this will all be based on the performance of just one aspect of the clubs involved - their playing squads (and only the first team squad, at that) - over a period of just one year. Just what is the fecking point of that?
[iCapisce[/i?'"
I accept and agree a large proportion of what you have written but lets just look at the championship on the last day of the season this year...York were relegated leaving Keighley, Swinton, Barrow and Hunslet going into the last match of the season fighting for retention of their ( see their not there) status as a championship club.
It brought a meaning to very game leading up to that weekends fixtures which you have to agree is completely lacking in Super league ( I hate that title..no reference to Rugby league at all) in fairness once clubs like Salford Castleford and London were knocked out of the Challenge cup what meaning did their season have.
I firmly believe that in all sincerity Rugby League is unsustainable as a full time sport which unless as you point out you get a benefactor who is prepared to splash the cash, once that happens you instantly get a two tier competition similar to what there is now.
Perhaps automatic promotion and relegation may not be best but to deny a club like Featherstone the chance asking them to wait potentially three years before being accepted is also very unfair, anything can happen in that three year window so which season do you choose as the one which grants them the chance. You say I am avoiding the question and to a degree I am since without looking the answer up I can't answer how many teams have been uplifted on each cycle but again I ask you how many have been dropped back down.?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 1114 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2015 | Aug 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
Salary cap - you're havin a laugh.: |
|
| Did you have this view last season when there was no relegation from the championship?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 987 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2016 | Sep 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
A.Marshall: |
|
| Quote: Talent Spotter "Did you have this view last season when there was no relegation from the championship?'"
Yes absolutely and had Swinton finished the season in the bottom two I would still have the same view.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 1642 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2015 | Apr 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
Someday, somewhere, today’s empires are tomorrow’s ashes.: |
|
| Quote: Marshy1 "
I accept and agree a large proportion of what you have written but lets just look at the championship on the last day of the season this year...York were relegated leaving Keighley, Swinton, Barrow and Hunslet going into the last match of the season fighting for retention of their ( see their not there) status as a championship club.
It brought a meaning to very game leading up to that weekends fixtures which you have to agree is completely lacking in Super league ( I hate that title..no reference to Rugby league at all) in fairness once clubs like Salford Castleford and London were knocked out of the Challenge cup what meaning did their season have.'"
Well done on the spelling. Smart phones have this amazing ability to spell better when the mistakes are pointed out to their operators.
To business
Are you advocating going back to part-time then? Jeez. Bye bye Tomkins, Bye bye Chase, Bye bye O'Loughlin, Charnley, Hall, Watkins.... Bye bye chances of ever beating Australia.
We have enough funds to sustain a limited number of full-time clubs. We need to be looking to increase funding so more clubs can become full-time, not regressing to some "straight aht o' t' pit an' straight in t' team" rose-tinted part-time past, surely.
If not (and surely you aren't) then we're stuck with the two tier competition. P&R won't bridge that divide.
Quote: Marshy1 "
Perhaps automatic promotion and relegation may not be best but to deny a club like Featherstone the chance asking them to wait potentially three years before being accepted is also very unfair, anything can happen in that three year window so which season do you choose as the one which grants them the chance. You say I am avoiding the question and to a degree I am since without looking the answer up I can't answer how many teams have been uplifted on each cycle but again I ask you how many have been dropped back down.?'"
Under franchising, clubs aren't judged on one season, so there's no season to choose. They're judged on the three year period as a whole. Featherstone have, this season, ticked one of the boxes that was required for them to be considered for elevation and they aren't being denied anything. What you appear to want, though, is for Featherstone (or whoever finishes top of the Championship) to be elevated from a part-time competition to a full-time one on the basis of one solitary season, and on one solitary aspect of that clubthe club[/i that gets promoted, remember, not the squad (in fact, it's often the case that the majority of the playing squad gets left behind). So why shouldn't access to SL be based on the [iclub's[/i performance rather than the squad's?
It's also worth noting that you - in keeping with all advocates of P&R - see the P but not the R. You claim it's unfair to deny Featherstone promotion. No mention of the relegated team. What happens to them? What happens to a club that has a full-time set up but which has, on the basis of one poor season (or in Salford's case, on the basis of accidentally having an extra player on the field for 20 seconds or so) has to make umpteen people redundant so it can restructure to a part-time operation, only to reverse that entire process nine months later because they're promoted again into the full-time competition, but in a much weakened state. Where is your sense of fairness there?
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 987 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2016 | Sep 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
A.Marshall: |
|
| Quote: Red John "Well done on the spelling. Smart phones have this amazing ability to spell better when the mistakes are pointed out to their operators.
To businessthe club[/i that gets promoted, remember, not the squad (in fact, it's often the case that the majority of the playing squad gets left behind). So why shouldn't access to SL be based on the [iclub's[/i performance rather than the squad's?
It's also worth noting that you - in keeping with all advocates of P&R - see the P but not the R. You claim it's unfair to deny Featherstone promotion. No mention of the relegated team. What happens to them? What happens to a club that has a full-time set up but which has, on the basis of one poor season (or in Salford's case, on the basis of accidentally having an extra player on the field for 20 seconds or so) has to make umpteen people redundant so it can restructure to a part-time operation, only to reverse that entire process nine months later because they're promoted again into the full-time competition, but in a much weakened state. Where is your sense of fairness there?'"
Clearly you have your view and I mine, what you have overlooked either through ignorance or a lack of vision from anything other than SL is that Featherstone have finished top of the pile for three years on the bounce so really you would expect them to be rewarded wouldn't you agree.?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 4159 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2019 | Oct 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
1602.jpg Sad preacher nailed upon the coloured door of time;
Insane teacher be there reminded of the rhyme.
There'll be no mutant enemy we shall certify;
Political ends, as sad remains, will die.:1602.jpg |
|
| and who says they will not...
However, whereas Featherstone has done well and the club certainly deserves a chance in SL, you fail to take into account the costs of being in SL and the effects it has had on the other two clubs in that borough.
Lastly, Leigh IMO were ruined by their "season in the sun"
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 987 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2016 | Sep 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
A.Marshall: |
|
| I accept what you say but by the same token teams who have fallen foul in terms of financial distress whilst in SL have remained making a complete farce of the franchise system.
Bradford spring to mind along with Wakefield and Salford who let's not forget till Koucash came along borrowed to the hilt to retain SL status.
Who's to say Featherstone or Leigh for that matter wouldn't have been better candidates.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 225 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2012 | 12 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2014 | Sep 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| I know lots of Salford fans who have an obsession with our club, it is good to see fans of other clubs are becoming equally obsessive....lol
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 11532 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Jan 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
6248_1358341317.jpg [b:2akkj491]Jeb End Reds[/b:2akkj491]
[color=#FF0000:2akkj491][b:2akkj491][url=hhtp://www/foreverreds.co.uk/:2akkj491]SUPPORT FOREVER REDS - THE SALFORD CITY REDS SUPPORTERS' TRUST[/url:2akkj491][/b:2akkj491][/color:2akkj491]
[b:2akkj491][color=red:2akkj491]MUFC[/color:2akkj491] ~ FCUM ~ [color=red:2akkj491]SRLFC[/color:2akkj491] ~ LCCC[/b:2akkj491]
[url=http://undergreylancastrianskies.blogspot.com/:2akkj491]My Blog[/url:2akkj491] ~ [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/8580799@N06/:2akkj491]My Flickr[/url:2akkj491]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_6248.jpg |
|
| Quote: Durham Giant "Actually under P & R you should be plying your trade in the Championship next season as you finished bottom. As bad as London have been they have NEVER finished bottom of SL'"
He's a Swinton fan you dizzy get. And stop quoting him, some of us are trying to avoid the two-faced numpty. (Jesus, I sounded like MR there, get help! )
As for this thread, how embarrassing and utterly pathetic. The reaction from some opposition fans to the whole takeover, including mates who have show sympathetic tendencies towards Salford in the past, has been utterly laughable.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 1642 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2015 | Apr 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
Someday, somewhere, today’s empires are tomorrow’s ashes.: |
|
| Quote: Marshy1 "Clearly you have your view and I mine, what you have overlooked either through ignorance or a lack of vision from anything other than SL is that Featherstone have finished top of the pile for three years on the bounce so really you would expect them to be rewarded wouldn't you agree.?'"
How are they not being rewarded? Aren't they being recognised as champions? If promotion is the only reward you recognise, then there's no reward for finishing top of SL, nor for winning the Grand Final. A bit ridiculous wouldn't you agree?
And while having a squad of players capable of finishing top of a part-time competition is a [inecessary[/i condition for elevation of [ithe club as a whole[/i to a full-time competition, by no means is it [isufficient[/i, as evidence from the pre-franchise past shows.
As for lack of vision or ignorance, I notice that, once again Marshy, you're all P and no R. What about the relegated club?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 10390 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2018 | Sep 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
11969.jpg Me and are kid (TheButcher) putting the world two rights.
ERIC SHAW PREDICTION LEAGUE & PLAY OFFS WINNER 2013
Don't like it? Well Frack off then. Energy & progress for all.
Foe is our friend.
mitie mouse, Lancetodd, Marshy1, eccles star, Dantes Inferno, Philyourboots, biggunbrad, DAVE@CAS1990, RED LEAGUE, OzWelsh, Red-Devils-PAW, newgroundb4wakey
All blocked - Go ahead punk make my day.:11969.jpg |
|
| Quote: GT "He's a Swinton fan you dizzy get. And stop quoting him, some of us are trying to avoid the two-faced numpty. (Jesus, I sounded like MR there, get help!
Did you ask to join my gang
Can't someone just kick him off? we pay our taxes and should therefore be allowed one blatant act of hatred to due our collective suffering from porcinaphobia.
I don't so much find if laughable but pitiful that these numpties can't go on their own forums and start discussions, think in some cases it's because it's difficult to have a conversation with someone else when your the only contributing fan.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 1642 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2015 | Apr 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
Someday, somewhere, today’s empires are tomorrow’s ashes.: |
|
|
Can I have permission to talk about the concepts of P&R vs franchising with him? Not much happens on the Swinton forum and I think he's lonely.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 1988 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2014 | Jul 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
8271_1307019918.jpg Per sempre Rosso e Bianco !!!:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_8271.jpg |
|
| Quote: middleman "Sorry just picked up on the unbelievable hypocrtical comment ..
Huddersfield
SL 1998 Huddersfield 12th - Wooden Spoon .... not relegated
SL 1999 Huddersfield 14th - Wooden Spoon . ....not Relegated
SL 2000 Huddersfield 12th -Wooden Spoon ...... Not Relegated
SL 2001 Huddersfield 12th - Wooden Spoon ....... not Relegated.
If only they practiced what they preached.'"
obviously a glory-hunter who isn't aware they played at FARTown
|
|
|
|
|
|