Hahaha Mr "Butch'' is always swiping at me, what you doing on here by the way. Is your Forum too quiet, so you thought you'd come on here and antagonize me, proving your boredom?

Josh Griffin compared to Greg Inglis shows a total lack of expertise or knowledge of the game. Anyone with half a Rugby brain knows the claim or comparison is absolutely ludicrous,except for you. You must fall into that category of knowledge or lack of.

I'm not asking for them to change anything as I respect what they are doing, however, the poor analysis is so off-putting. Like I said its constructive criticism.and not a swipe.

It wasn't a swipe but you're far too arrogant to accept that peoples views of ability are subjective. I point this out and all you can do is have a pop at me, which says a lot about you as an individual. As for making ludicrous claims (I haven't made any even though you think I have. Bit weird. I just pointed out that opinion on ability is subjective), I'll default to your superior knowledge in everything ludicrous...

Gee Whiz give it a rest, You're making such a fuss and a mountain out of a molehill here. Antagonizing as usual. I'm stating an opinion where 99.9% of the Rugby League world would agree with hardly subjective is it. My original post wasn't to demerit the show in any way shape or form, only the analysis needs a little tweaking.

Anyway, like I mentioned in my original post to the "Devil In The Detail'' don't take this as a swipe. Then you barge in like you always do, trying to instigate an argument and twisting the whole shebang because your little cliquey forum is dead, so to eradicate your boredom you come back on here and bubble the waters with me.

I wasn't arguing or instigating an argument, Stan. I pointed out that you can't ask someone to change their podcast pundit based on something that is subjective. Whether you, I or anyone else agrees or not. Why you'd suggest someone get rid of a mate who helps out on a podcast is beyond me full stop. Especially when they do it for fun, others fun, no profit, and you have don't contribute to any of its production. How can that be helpful or constructive? It's a bit like asking someone to change their voice because you don't like the sound of it.

You find anyone who disagrees with you 'antagonizing' when clearly all I've done is point something out that a grown adult should already be aware of.

The above post again is antagonizing. Please show me where I've told them to get rid. Now I mentioned tweak Now go and cause trouble on your own patch instead of nurturing your boredom on here.

You see, Stan. I've been on here for thirteen years. You don't get to tell me where I can and can't post. So you might as well not bother trying to tell me again as you'll just be wasting your own efforts.

Like I've said numerous times, you class anyone who disagrees with you 'Antagonizing'. So it's no surprise that you see it here, when it isn't. Why can't you just have a discussion like an adult instead of writing like a petulant child?

I will, go and stir trouble on your own forum instead of muddying these boards. At the end of the day you migrated because of me and now you're back pestering me to fulfill your sad boring life. Now Do One.

Absolute nonsense. Elevator Muzak. That's you to a tee.

Some constructive criticism on your post, if you want to make " constructive criticism" don't post fix it with "wow what was that guy smoking". It does make it sounds like, well, a swipe.

Got people talking tho didnt it
We take compliments and advice on how to make the show better. Non of us a proffessionals just blokes that stand on the terrace.
Thanks for listening the more interaction the better

.

I don't wish to have a squabble with you pal. But Josh Griffin shouldn't be compared to Greg Inglis in any way shape or form, nevermind mentioned in the same sentence. Josh Griffin is taking his chances well with regards to scoring tries, however, intermittently his defensive reads have been shocking, he lacks the pace to even be considered a Fullback nevermind his weakness and ineffectiveness in the taking of high balls which was highlighted by Ryan on the Podcast which I thought was a self-contradictory comment. So by Ryans logic a player with Zero pace who struggles to read the game defensively, who often gets out jumped under the high ball, would or could be a Greg Inglis of the future. Greg Inglis is the total opposite of Josh Griffin. He's fast, reads the game perfectly, hardly gets out jumped and is arguably the best strike player in the world. Case closed.

.

Hahaha If you're comparing Griffin with Inglis, It shows your lack of Rugby League knowledge.