If someone knows the owner of the club has a dislike for them and dislikes the ownership why desire too work with/for the club again.

I'm shocked this is all still about the article written around a year or so ago, I was sure something else had been written.

As someone else said, just move on.

Just so you know JGR, the said person now appears to have landed a job with the club.

Over twelve months.

You've resurrected a thread and topic that was dead and buried just to cause mischief. You only ever pop-up to create negativity wherever you land. You failed at cutting and pasting other peoples work so I'm not surprised your bitter and lazy posts are all that you have.

Sad little man.

It could have been worse we could have had an ex newspaper hack landing a job with the club.

So I believe.

As I said over 12 months ago though unless you're professionally qualified with necessary experience you shouldn't be holding positions within a professional sports club regardless of the position. That said I have no idea what position she is taking up and whether or not she is adequately experienced. I assume she has been appointed on the back of the many photoshop graphics that she has tweeted and I therefore assume her job title is "Graphic Designer"?

One thing is for sure as a die hard fan like the rest of us I am sure she will give 110% and work far more hours than she will be paid for (assuming she is being paid that is!).

PS - it also shows just how embarrassing it was of the official clubs Twitter account to block her.

Give it a rest Paul.

You are Louise being good 'Twitter Fwends' means you were bound to never look at this objectively.

For the rest of us we have every right to scrutinise the club and whilst I think she is a nice person I'm with JGR on this one and question her role.

JGR, while I agree with your conclusion it does seem to be at odds with your post about Iain Blease.

In this thread you say that the Club shouldn't employ anyone who isn't professionally qualified or without the necessary experience. Yet on the Blease thread you think it's great that the Club has employed someone without any qualifications or experience as a CEO. Just wondering about that.

I'm not having a go btw, just an observation.

I agree with you JGR. I'm sure Louise is a nice person but just because she can design a poster on Microsoft Paint doesnt mean she should be employed by the club.

Koukash's entire reign has been marred by him appointing the wrong people in the wrong positions Vickers, Harris, Puletua, Noble etc. He will admit this himself.

To me this stinks of Koukash trying to buy himself some more time with fans by appointing one of the most vocal. From what I can gather she has spent the majority of the past 2 years vocally criticisng him and likewise he has her. Now however Koukash is bigging up her job on twitter and the impression I get is that she is going to be in charge of marketing the club!?

Questions have to be asked of what experience she has of this. At the end of the day it us, the season ticket holders, who will be paying her salary. It is only right we question this appointment.

I've never met the girl, so well done on your expert research. You're not even a Salford fan. Why do you even bother coming on here and do nothing but spread negativity?

There's nothing wrong with scrutinising the Club. I've hardly been some bastion of positivity when the Club does things wrong it's just that all you do, and I mean everything you do, is negative on here.

I don't see the point in resurrecting a thread that's 12 months old to simply cause mischief when the incidents talked about have happened, passed, been healed and moved on.

Something you should do yourself.

Good luck to louise & every other Salford supporter who is given a chance to try & make a positive difference within the Salford club. I am sure if we all agreed with each other life would be pretty boring. Ian Watson as shown on a professional level what it meant to him, maybe some of this as rubbed off on MK.
Giving supporters the chance to make a difference can only be good for the club, we tried everything else.
Finally I would like to see a network like forever reds back again, for me in the hey day they made a significant contribution which cannot be underestimated.

As an outsider looking in,if you are a news reporter in an earlier life,the beautifully ironic appointment of Eccles born Nigel Roberts is by far the most controversial appointment.

If he can do 2 jobs at 2 different places is he worthy of a full time salary from the RFL?

Whatever paper qualifications are required for the position given to Louise there ain't nobody at any club who has the enthusiasm and devotion to their club as she has for Salford Red Devils.Just as enthusiasm and devotion on the pitch covers up many technical faults her enthusiasm makes up for a lack of academic qualifications.

I am not one for criticising Dr Koukash but I did think he was hyper-sensitive about the article written by Louise which made the RLW,if I recall correctly.
Understandable I suppose given the ridiculous over-the-top abuse Dr K endures from the 'rugby league family'.

Despite the complaints Louise has received - from fans attending away games that she has not attended etc.etc. she has kept on being positive and rallying the troops behind the cause,and sending positive vibes to players and fans on a consistent and regular basis despite she herself,health-wise, being under the weather to very ill.You cannot buy that type of support.

Name me another supporter anywhere who has her energy levels,and eats sleeps and drinks their club,in a similar way Louise does for Salford Red Devils? Not only prepared to walk the walk but she certainly knows how to talk the talk.

Good luck Salford.Continue being controversial for all the right reasons.( I still can't quite believe your last game.)

If you are not allowed to do the job then you cannot gain experience.Having an opinion and being critical means you care sufficiently to have an opinion and be critical.

I personally think it's a great appointment; someone who wears their heart on their sleeve, looking to do their very best to promote the Club. I can't think of any reason why there's negativity surrounding this.

The problem is that "passion" and "enthusiasm" count for nothing in the real job market and listing them on a CV wont get you a job by default. Let alone a job which requires raising attendances at a club which has struggled to increase crowds for 30 years.

If we recruited on passion and enthusiasm alone we'd have Bobbie Goulding as our head coach which I seem to remember no one wanted.

This isn't personal, however it is individual criticism of Louise. Of all the appointments yesterday I believe hers is the most bizarre and unjustified yet it appears to have receicved the least scrutiny of all which i find odd.

Logically, common sense would dictate that there is more than just myself and JGR on this board who question this appointment. It seems odd that more arent questioning this. Then again, I suppose none of our fans want to lose a follower on twitter