I am sorry you cannot make yourself understood. Your response to your error was graceless.

Whether you are convinced or afford me any credibility is irrelevant. Salford have substantially increased player expenditure in 20011/12 this has not been matched by on field performance or revenues. This is why smith has gone, Holdworth is being touted around and the 'replacement' for Patten will not be on a similar salary. I do not agree with Salford supporters re salaries in 2011/12. However I do agree that in 2013 / 14 the salary spend will be substantially lower than most SL clubs.

I see you made up a season we're 18,000 years away from to support your argument so I would suspect that we will be spending a lot more then.
Wrong wrong wrong, you come on here knowing only a very small part of the player expenditure at Salford, you spoke to one player who as with anyone going somewhere else it is always for more money, (the grass is Greener springs to mind), why would he tell you what he or any other player was getting?
For one player expenditure was cut this season from the season 2010/2011, we are well under the cap, thats why Ratchford went, we could not afford what he wanted, but I lay my hat down to some one who knows so much they can see so far into the future, do you have this Friday's lottery numbers, then Salford could pay the full cap.

Oh a typo! I will not be as graceless as GT re this type of error.

The 18000 years stuff is...inspid. Oh dear.

Re Wild, do try and keep up. SW is on LESS money than his last contract at the Giants. However it is far more than he was offered to stay (for a year) and he got a 3 year deal. If you want to pretend that Wild, Patten, Holdsworth, Smith, Anderson , Feka , bailey (severence forms part of the salary spend)etc etc etc were all taking well below the market rate then do so.

Your Ratchford comments show you are out of your depth. Clubs will determine what they will pay a player. If other clubs have a higher valuation / have fewer players in that position /offer better coaching / offer better chances of winning silverware / offer better chances of international honours etc then they may outbid a club. The salary cap may not be a deciding factor.

Many are aware of players taking cuts / waiting for payments. This could as easily suggest that a club extended itself too far on salaries (paying near to the cap) and is now cutting back. HTH.

It's a little like your post's then keep taking the tablets.

OK.Do you mean the reality ones ?

Cyanide I hope

A reference to Shuddersfield, how quaint. Oh dear.

Wild did not lie to me. But call him a liar if it helps you pretend salford have not been near the top end of the cap. Likewise the implication that many of the big name players are accepting buttons to play at Salford (a fashionable club maybe?) is nonsense.

Pev to be fair, you know me and I know you, but now is probably a good time to quit in this argument because this Huddersfield fan has you on the rack! I know your biased to Salford, but to be fair in this argument for a supposedly intelligent man you aren't doing yourself any favors, no offence like!!!

Great posting Cripesginger. It wouldn't surprise me if your comments regarding spending near full cap was true especially with this move to Barton. Again it shows the board still remain ijit's and how they still feed us a load of porkies.

And the Love fest brigade Early Bath, BigPev Michigan Dread and co they'd love another 3 decades of those big pork pies.....They think Salford aren't making money.. Believe me he wouldn't be doing it if he wasn't.