So are you familiar with Wild's wrist / arm problems that have plagued him for a good few years? I suspect not. Warrington and Leeds have deep squads and are 2 of the best clubs re conditioning and sports medicine. for example hodgson has been left out a few times to rest him - something that a smart coach woud do with Wild.

Wild was excellent for the Giants and i have little doubt he will do a decent job for another year. But 2012 and 13, I doubt it. While he has always been a high tackler his missed tackles rate has rocketed this season. SW is being run into the ground whie crocks like bailey and anderson have given you nothing.I am glad SW has big money through 2013

I am focussing on facts so the need to create fictional grudges is pointless. If simms has done a good job for you, you are easily pleased.

Just out of interest (Assuming you are involved with the Giants as you say you are) why are you so interested in Simms and Salford Reds?

[url=http://www.giantsrl.com/news/article/506/brown-remains-as-giants-headBrowns stays on[/url

Nathan Brown Signs a new 12 month Deal to keep him at the Galpharm , Cue renewed interest from about half a dozen Aus Coaches in the Salford Job now that the plum job in SL gone..

This is the ' Official New coach Thread '
maybe we need another Simms is Clueless Thread and a 'Our Squad is small & Crocked Thread for the last 2 pages ..

where did i say that? Don't make stuff up.

Always liked salford. As a kid my dad was a mate of dai watkins so I saw a lot of games at the willows and the players seemed like stars to me. I also think JW is a real gentleman - like ken Davy - and deserves a bit of success.

I think Simms is 3rd rate and a real block on Salford's progress. The Wrigley announcement was unprofessional and i have seen nothing to suggest SS is doing a good job as Director of football. A good 'would be coach' will want to know about staff, sport science, youth development and playing personnel. Has SS laid quality foundations for a new coach?

There is no definition for the role. For example, from a public perspective a 'director of football' at a football club is largely anonymous compared to the manager, who is the main man (with a few exceptions where said incumbent has aspirations for the manager's job e.g. Gerard Houllier & Avram Grant). While in rugby union the 'director of football' is usually [ithe[/i main man: the manager or head coach equivalent. There's no doubt that although these roles have the same title, they have different remits.

As far as criticising Simms is concerned, you have to consider what it is he does.



If he is responsible for elements of recruiting players, coaches and what not, then yes, he is set up for scrutiny — whether it be from the media, the fans and the board. However, if he is effectively a go-between for the board, its eyes and ears on the football department, its day-to-day media mouthpiece/face, then he's more beyond reproach. Because if the board, who invest their own cash into the business, trusts him to carry out this job (bearing in mind [itrust[/i is a hard commodity to find) then he is likely to stay in the role regardless of what happens. Criticism would then more likely have to lie on the head coach and the chairman. Not particularly my view of course, but something you have to consider.

Interesting that Simms has been at the club years in a 'senior post' and yet his role is shrouded in mystery!

Like value toilet paper, sh=#000000it does not stick.

Indeed.

I hope you guys get your own 'nathan brown' or 'Maguire' and your 1st season in the new stadium is an exciting one.

Stolen from Twitter. Thanks City Red Girl!
[urlhttp://www.weststigersforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=179821[/url

Interesting to note how highly he is regarded at the Club.

Yes Michigan,you are dead right,you are not the sharpest tool,in or out of the box,your spelling and grammar are the
give away.I think the word you were looking for was purport,not potrot, is that Polish.I don't purport to be a Salford fan I am one.Probably for a lot longer than your good self,unlike you, I like a lot of people think the club is being
run amateurishly.This his the club who took the captaincy of Alker,only to give it him back six weeks later
the club who were only two weeks ago,giving out new contract's to players,when the new coach mite not want them
only for Simms to rightly change his mind.the only chance we have got,Is to get a coach who no's what he is doing
then for Tarry Simms and the rest of the board,to get out of his way. Tarry gave an interview, listen to it and you will
see why we are in the mess we are

Spelling and grammar?
Those in glass houses......

Well as you point out my spelling isn't the best but then again being profoundly dyslexic I think I'm allowed the odd slip up. The spelling mistakes aside (though I think might or mite and no's or know's are easier to spell than purport)I think I make more vaild points than you do and don't chose to hide behind an internet forum to obviosuly snipe at a club and organisation you have an axe to grind.

As others have said the club is run on the tightest shoe string and without a massive cash injection for backroom staff, better training and sundries we will always struggle regaurdless of who we put out on the field. That is why myself and other fair minded fans are willing to see what change of fortune the new stadium gives us before we begin to slag officials at the club off.